Al Gore predicts man made global warming...oops!

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sgrayatlarge <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> (AP)  GENEVA — A fundamental pillar of physics — that nothing can go faster 
> than the speed of light — appears to be smashed by an oddball subatomic 
> particle that has apparently made a giant end run around Albert Einstein's 
> theories.
> 
> Scientists at the world's largest physics lab said Thursday they have clocked 
> neutrinos traveling faster than light. That's something that according to 
> Einstein's 1905 special theory of relativity — the famous E (equals) mc2 
> equation — just doesn't happen.
> 
> "The feeling that most people have is this can't be right, this can't be 
> real," said James Gillies, a spokesman for the European Organization for 
> Nuclear Research, or CERN, outside the Swiss city of Geneva.
> 
> Gillies told The Associated Press that the readings have so astounded 
> researchers that they are asking others to independently verify the 
> measurements before claiming an actual discovery.
> 
> "They are inviting the broader physics community to look at what they've done 
> and really scrutinize it in great detail, and ideally for someone elsewhere 
> in the world to repeat the measurements," he said Thursday.
> 
> Scientists at the competing Fermilab in Chicago have promised to start such 
> work immediately.
> 
> "It's a shock," said Fermilab head theoretician Stephen Parke, who was not 
> part of the research in Geneva. "It's going to cause us problems, no doubt 
> about that - if it's true."
> 
> The Chicago team had similar faster-than-light results in 2007, but those 
> came with a giant margin of error that undercut its scientific significance.
> 
> Outside scientists expressed skepticism at CERN's claim that the neutrinos — 
> one of the strangest well-known particles in physics — were observed smashing 
> past the cosmic speed barrier of 186,282 miles per second (299,792 kilometers 
> per second).
> 
> University of Maryland physics department chairman Drew Baden called it "a 
> flying carpet," something that was too fantastic to be believable.
> 
> CERN says a neutrino beam fired from a particle accelerator near Geneva to a 
> lab 454 miles (730 kilometers) away in Italy traveled 60 nanoseconds faster 
> than the speed of light. Scientists calculated the margin of error at just 10 
> nanoseconds, making the difference statistically significant. But given the 
> enormous implications of the find, they still spent months checking and 
> rechecking their results to make sure there was no flaws in the experiment.
> 
> "We have not found any instrumental effect that could explain the result of 
> the measurement," said Antonio Ereditato, a physicist at the University of 
> Bern, Switzerland, who was involved in the experiment known as OPERA.
> 
> The CERN researchers are now looking to the United States and Japan to 
> confirm the results.
> 
> A similar neutrino experiment at Fermilab near Chicago would be capable of 
> running the tests, said Stavros Katsanevas, the deputy director of France's 
> National Institute for Nuclear and Particle Physics Research. The institute 
> collaborated with Italy's Gran Sasso National Laboratory for the experiment 
> at CERN.
> 
> Katsanevas said help could also come from the T2K experiment in Japan, though 
> that is currently on hold after the country's devastating March 11 earthquake 
> and tsunami.
> 
> Scientists agree if the results are confirmed, that it would force a 
> fundamental rethink of the laws of nature.
> 
> Einstein's special relativity theory that says energy equals mass times the 
> speed of light squared underlies "pretty much everything in modern physics," 
> said John Ellis, a theoretical physicist at CERN who was not involved in the 
> experiment. "It has worked perfectly up until now."
> 
> He cautioned that the neutrino researchers would have to explain why similar 
> results weren't detected before, such as when an exploding star — or 
> supernova — was observed in 1987.
> 
> "This would be such a sensational discovery if it were true that one has to 
> treat it extremely carefully," said Ellis.
>


Reply via email to