LOL..truth doesn't need any support, Enlightenment doesn't need any approval from others, an individual always stands apart. Who ever supports here do it out of their conscience, I don't care for anyone's approval, concern or support.
Hypocrites cluster together, retards cluster together, perverts cluster together. Curtis is the victim..LOL.. He is being comforted, caressed by clusters, clusters of hypocrites, retards, perverts. It's a gala time, party time - have fun you all. On Jan 8, 2012, at 12:21 PM, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> wrote: > OK, here we go again... > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> > wrote: > > > > Curtis has been silently supporting malicious lies, innuendo and rumors on > > FFL for years. > > Ok fair enough, an opinion I do not share. > > > > > Curtis has been a man of authority in cults with shady, sketchy past. He > > has aligned himself with former cult members including TM, Frederick Lenz > > aka Rama. > > I don't know what you mean by "aligned myself", but I have no relationship > with Rama at all in any way. There is a POV where you could view everyone > here as having associated with former cult members, it kinda defines the > place. > > > > > He has had no problem supporting individuals who accuse people of having > > sex with animals, implying sexual relations between members of FFL.> > > Supporting who, how? I am opposed to anyone having sex with animals. As far > as sex between FFL members go, that is up to them I have no opinion. I don't > support when people like Jim create graphic depictions of me having sex with > others here. > > > > > Curtis supports people who indulge in throwing armchair labels at people, > > supports posters who constantly, maliciously assign labels to others. > > OK, another opinion. Kinda lame but that is my opinion. > > > > > He has no problem when individuals maliciously harass 70 year old women.> > > I would have a problem with people harassing anyone. For example I am against > you harassing me here on this board. > > > > > His recent change of heart comes as he gets a taste of his own medicine.> > > No, I have been an advocate against the idea that we have a moral imperative > to jump in on other people's fights with Judy for years now. > > > > > He had no problem maliciously trying to twist an innocent story of Ravi's > > New Year party. > > Actually you lied about it repeatedly. In your latest version you actually > did buy liquor for an underage girls but despite our having had it clarified > that people in that particular club wear indicators if they are underage, you > claim you didn't know. Then you claim they threw her out and you drank it. > All after you had claimed it was all a lie to suck me in. > > So if you are troubled by people judging you for your actual stated behavior, > try not posting stories about you doing illegal things and then making up a > lot of unconvincing denials after getting called on it. > > > > > > Welcome to FFL - Hyprocrites"R"Us > > > > Signed. > > > > Raunchydog > > Duveyoung > > Buck > > Feste37 > > Wayback71 > > See this is what I was trying to avoid. I'm the lightening rod here Ravi. > Focus on me. I'm the bad bad man who doesn't believe that you are enlightened > or that your abusive behavior here is cute or shows what a special guy you > are. I object to your spreading lies about me on this board, but since I have > the power to post back, I feel confident that your malicious agenda has no > power to hurt me. Over here big guy, Curtis is the one who is making you feel > this way. Keep em coming till you post out. There you go, atta boy, keep on > punching, punch, punch, punch at the bad, bad man. > > You are not gunna troll me out Ravi. > > > > > > > On Jan 8, 2012, at 6:09 AM, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > > > > Ravi has been mounting a campaign to spread malicious lies about me on > > > this message board. I hope anyone interested in researching me or > > > checking up on my character will take the time do a search on this > > > individual's posts here so that you can understand what I am dealing > > > with. This is not an uncommon phenomenon in this Internet age of freedom > > > of expression. > > > > > > This individual does not know me personally, or have any inside > > > information about me. > > > > > > > > > >
