I think it's a great idea. I think that anything that causes health problems
should be taxed sufficiently to drive down consumption and pay for the
problems it causes. Otherwise, people who don't drink the stuff end up
paying through higher health insurance premiums, which they seldom take
advantage of, because they tend not to get sick.

 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of nablusoss1008
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 2:58 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] How Many Lives Could a Soda Tax Save?

 

  


UCSF Analysis Suggests Tax on Sugary Beverages Would Prevent Heart Disease,
Stroke and Diabetes, Save Billions in Health Care Costs 


Share this story: 

Share   <http://w.sharethis.com/images/check-small.png> 

[Send Email] Print
<http://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/01/11267/how-many-lives-could-soda-tax-save>


By Jason Bardi <mailto:%20jason.ba...@ucsf.edu>  on January 9, 2012

 Stock image of soda cans
<http://www.ucsf.edu/sites/default/files/soda.can_000015340230xsmall.jpg?132
6141886> 

Every year, Americans drink 13.8 billion gallons of soda, fruit punch, sweet
tea, sports drinks, and other sweetened beverages - a mass consumption of
sugar that is fueling soaring obesity and diabetes rates in the United
States. 

Now a group of scientists at the University of California, San Francisco
(UCSF), San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center (SFGH) and Columbia
University have analyzed the effect of a nationwide tax on these sugary
drinks.

They estimate slapping a penny-per-ounce tax on sweetened beverages would
prevent nearly 100,000 cases of heart disease, 8,000 strokes, and 26,000
deaths over the next decade.

 Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, MD, PhD
<http://www.ucsf.edu/sites/default/files/bibbins_domingok.jpg?1326141235> 

Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, MD, PhD

"You would also prevent 240,000 cases of diabetes per year," said Kirsten
Bibbins-Domingo
<http://profiles.ucsf.edu/ProfileDetails.aspx?Person=5279558> , MD, PhD, an
associate professor of medicine and of epidemiology and biostatistics at
UCSF and acting director of the Center for Vulnerable Populations at the
UCSF-affiliated SFGH.


U.S. Consumption of Sweet Beverages


*       13.8 billion: Number of gallons consumed in 2009
*       45: Number of gallons consumed annually per person 
*       17: Number of teaspoons of sugar in a typical 22-oz soda
*       70,000: Number of calories average person consumes per year in sweet
drinks

Source: HealthAffairs
<http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/31/1/199.full> 

 


Diabetes in the United States


*       25.8 million: Number of people who have diabetes
*       8.3: Percentage of population affected
*       174 billion: Annual cost in dollars of diabetes 
*       7: Ranking on list of leading causes of death

Source: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

 

In addition to $13 billion per year in direct tax revenue, Bibbins-Domingo
and her colleagues estimated that such a tax would save the public $17
billion over the next decade in health care-related expenses due to the
decline of obesity-related diseases.

"Our hope is that these types of numbers are useful for policy makers to
weigh decisions," she said.


High Cost of High-Calorie Drinks


Consumption of beverages high in calories but poor in nutritional value is
the number one source of added sugar and excess calories in the American
diet. Sugar-sweetened drinks are linked to type 2 diabetes and weight gain.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) listed reducing
the intake of these beverages as one of its chief obesity prevention
strategies in 2009, and several states and cities, including California and
New York City, are already considering such taxes.

The analysis by Bibbins-Domingo and her colleagues is among the first study
to generate concrete estimates of the health benefits and cost savings of
such a tax. They modeled these benefits by taking into account how many
sodas and sugary beverages Americans drink every year and estimating how
much less they would consume if a penny-per-ounce tax were imposed on these
drinks. Economists have estimated that such a tax would reduce consumption
by 10 percent to 15 percent over a decade.

They then modeled how this reduction would play out in terms of reducing the
burdens of diabetes, heart disease and their associated health care costs.

The article, "A Penny-Per-Ounce Tax On Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Would Cut
Health And Cost Burdens Of Diabetes," by Y. Claire Wang, Pamela Coxson,
Yu-Ming Shen, Lee Goldman and Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo appears in the January
issue of Health Affairs <http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0410> . 

This work was funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the American
Heart Association, Western States Affiliate.

UCSF is a leading university dedicated to promoting health worldwide through
advanced biomedical research, graduate-level education in the life sciences
and health professions, and excellence in patient care.

 

http://rajpatel.org/



  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4738 - Release Date: 01/12/12

Reply via email to