On 01/12/2012 07:20 PM, wgm4u wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu<noozguru@...> wrote: >> On 01/12/2012 03:38 PM, John wrote: >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu<noozguru@> wrote: >>>> On 01/12/2012 11:05 AM, John wrote: >>>>> This is the old policy of speaking softly but carrying a big stick. >>>>> >>>>> http://news.yahoo.com/u-military-moves-carriers-denies-iran-023925806.html >>>> No, it's the old policy to start a war to get out of an economic >>>> depression. There is no way with trillions of bad assets in the world >>>> to correct the greatest global economic depression in history so they >>>> think throwing a war will do the trick. Problem is the next form of >>>> monetary exchange may be pebbles. >>>> >>> The immediate concern for the US is to protect the oil trade in the area. >>> Iran could potentially choke Europe and the US by stopping all oil tankers >>> in the straight of Hormuz. If they do that, they could face wrath of Obama >>> and the US navy in the area. >> You buying into the propaganda. Leave Iran alone and there won't be any >> problem with oil stoppage. >>> Conventional wisdom would say that the Iranians should toe the line. >>> However, with the current leadership in Iran, there's a good chance that a >>> shoot out would ensue from this standoff. >> The US is goading Iran into a war for their little buddy Israel even >> though the former leader of the Mossad said Iran is not a threat. > He sounds like a Ron Paul supporter to me...hey, hey bhairitu is actually a > Republican!!
Ron Paul isn't the only one who is opposed to a war with Iran. Most thinking people are opposed to it too.
