The Movement is in good hands.

 

That was my unequivocal conclusion about Tony Nader after spending the
afternoon at a seminar he gave in NY yesterday.    This was a seminar
briefly describing his discovery of the Ramayana in human anatomy.   He
wanted to actually start on time (!) but was caught in traffic coming in
from NJ - so he got on a cell phone and just started talking to us from the
car rather than keeping us waiting or listening to Haglen kill time.    When
he arrived he spoke for about an hour and I found the talk mildly
interesting - which was personally significant as I was anticipating a
boring afternoon of gobbly gook followed by a commercial for money.    Then
he just stopped and said that what he really wanted  to do was to connect
with the audience (mostly governors and meditators).  

 

It was during the Q & A that I really woke up.   I found him to be
refreshingly sweet and humble.   Of course he was well versed in the topic
but what was most inviting was his style.    He honored everyone's
questions, gave an interesting answer, then would say something like: "was
that a good answer?"   in a very sweet and honest manner.   

 

Some of the most memorable questions were about how his mind was able to
cognize these correlations.   He explained that he would think about the
subject over and over again and then ask Maharishi about the details  of
some Vedic literature.   While Maharisihi was explaining say how Nyaya works
Tony would perceive himself as if back in medical school and just hear the
vedic terminology as Maharishi was speaking as if it were physiologic
terminology.    Then when he wanted to go deeper Maharishi told him to stay
in the room underneath his bedroom and hole up there in silence for 6
months.

 

After the general audience left he held a business meeting with the local
governors to go over their teaching issues etc.   This too was conducted in
a refreshing style of openness.  

Tony would speak to them as equals - fellow teachers - invite solutions and
then make a decision that usually pleased the group.    He would remember
Maharishi's reasoning about an issue but if that did not apply he would
break with the old dogma and say "let's try this".   I was surprised with
his flexibility and the lack of rigidity that used to be a real turn off for
me in dealing with movement administrators.   My experience was that he was
coming more from the heart and less from the head.     If you've attended
meetings with him before you probably have come to the same conclusions.  

 

We're having lunch with him tomorrow and then he'll be addressing a few
hundred Indo-American doctors in Long Island - included are some of our
dentists.   I'll let you know how that goes.  

 

For now I have renewed hope and faith that the movement will endure under
the kinder more flexible leadership of Tony Nader.

 

Reply via email to