--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Shain McVay <shainm307@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually what I
> > > should say is there was at least a whole bunch of neutral people with at 
> > > least
> > > one skeptic, which was either the police chief of fire chief of 
> > > Washington DC.
> > > He said it would take a foot of snow to reduce crime rate by the 
> > > predicted 20%.
> > > However,  after the study was done, they didn't reduce the crime rate by 
> > > 20%, they reduced it by 25%. So this just goes to show the amount of 
> > > evidence behind the Maharishi Effect.
> > >  
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > >  From: Shain McVay <shainm307@>
> > > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
> > > Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 7:07 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Consciousness and Quantum Gibberish
> > >   
> > > 
> > >  
> > >    
> > >  
> > > Whoever wrote that never truly did their research. I mean when they did 
> > > the Washington DC study, they had a whole bunch of skeptics in with them 
> > > making sure the study was conducted correctly. When they did the study 
> > > not only did all the skeptics agree to all the ways the study was 
> > > conducted, but also they agreed to the findings of the study. The 
> > > Maharishi people weren't the only one's directing and analyzing the 
> > > study. The findings of just this one study are overwhelming in presenting 
> > > that the Maharishi Effect is true. Now they've done the studies over 90 
> > > times and they've found the same thing happen everytime - the crime rate 
> > > goes down.\
> > 
> > 
> > Bingo. This Dr Pagels is just representing age-old ignorance. His days are 
> > numbered 
> 


> Apparently, Heinz is already a has bean.


Just like his "ideas".


> 
> and the future will laugh at his insistence of holding on to old belifs and 
> structures.
>


Reply via email to