--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@...> wrote: > > Anyone who has ever edited a wikipedia page knows it is Very Bad Form to > anonymously edit, so it is doubtful if it was anyone other than a reader of > this group who got upset that I added John's name to the list. > > And you keep suggesting that Hagelin isn't a real scientist because his > writings were "abstract" or something. Flipped SU(5) was pretty popular in > its day. > > BTW, Hagelin's page is pretty neutral these days. You may not like it, but > that implies something about your own biases.
My only bias is against quackery and fraud. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hagelin > > L. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Er, you didn't read his wikipedia page, did you. Click on his name in > > > > > that list. It automatically takes you to the John Hagelin page. > > > > > > > > Just went to have a look and it seems he's been removed, what > > > > happened, your doing? > > > > > > > > > Nope. Someone anonymously logged on simply to delete his entry. The > > > account was created only to do that. IP: 74.110.139.37 > > > > Weird, but not too much of a mystery, probably a physicist > > or someone who takes it all a bit more seriously than John > > does at the moment. Or someone who reads this and doesn't > > think JHs weird take on the world should reach a wider > > audience. Or how about John himself, notified by the office > > that things are about to get embarrassing. > > > > I had a good time checking out some of the others on the > > list, some real smart dudes. Wish I was like that, can't > > imagine how good it must feel to really *get* what's going > > on rather than just having an incomplete abstract idea. > > > > Funny old thing wiki, I've read so many things that were > > obviously written by biased special interest groups not > > least on the TM page, which was a riot early on as you are > > undoubtably aware. Anything even remotely contentious has > > to be treated with a pinch of salt I think. The whole > > thing needs a good editor IMO, but that might kind of undo > > its main purpose. > > > > > > L. > > > > > >
