Yes and NO, we need the Bush tax cuts for all (including the middle class) 
extended!

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> wrote:
>
> Well, luckily for you, Congress is paralyzed.
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: wgm4u <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2012 1:50 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Obama's scary socialist past revealed, 
> (breaking).
>  
> 
>   
> It is breaking, that is, new evidence of his socialist past has surfaced in 
> the logs of the *New Party* just today; their goals and 'his' are scary if 
> you ask me!! It all adds up, we now know Obama much better, IMO.
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > "(breaking)"--too funny.
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Whatever....this is insane.  The reality is not even this.  Obama 
> > > has supported so many aspects of the Republican agenda, that there is 
> > > likely a solid argument that could be made (not by me) for the idea that 
> > > what we are really voting on is the difference between 2 Republican 
> > > candidates.   These scare tactics are pathetic and extreme.  My 
> > > grandparents forwarded me the National Review for years, back when it was 
> > > bashing numbers of educational institutions for being "communist" - they 
> > > were concerned about what my professors might be teaching me.  The rag 
> > > is completely over the top crazy in my view.    
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > >  From: wgm4u <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2012 8:03 AM
> > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Obama's scary socialist past revealed, 
> > > (breaking).
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   
> > > June 7, 2012 4:00 A.M.Obama's Third-Party History 
> > > New documents shed new light on his ties to a leftist party in the 1990s. 
> > > By Stanley Kurtz 
> > > Archive Latest E-Mail RSS Send 
> > > Barack Obama campaigns for the Illinois state senate in the mid-1990s.
> > > 
> > > inShare24 
> > > Print 
> > > Text    
> > > Comments 
> > > 66 Stanley Kurtz  
> > > On the evening of January 11, 1996, while Mitt Romney was in the final 
> > > years of his run as the head of Bain Capital, Barack Obama formally 
> > > joined the New Party, which was deeply hostile to the mainstream of the 
> > > Democratic party and even to American capitalism. In 2008, candidate 
> > > Obama deceived the American public about his 
> > > potentially damaging tie to this third party. The issue remains as fresh 
> > > as today's headlines, as Romney argues that Obama is trying to move the 
> > > United States toward European-style social democracy, which was 
> > > precisely the New Party's goal.
> > > In late October 2008, when I wrote here at National Review Online that 
> > > Obama had been a member of the New Party, his campaign sharply denied it, 
> > > calling my claim a "crackpot smear." Fight the Smears, an official 
> > > Obama-campaign website, staunchly 
> > > maintained that "Barack has been a member of only one political party, 
> > > the Democratic Party." I rebutted this, but the debate was never taken up 
> > > by the mainstream press.
> > > Recently obtained evidence from the updated records of Illinois ACORN at 
> > > the Wisconsin Historical Society now definitively establishes that 
> > > Obama was a member of the New Party. He also signed a "contract" 
> > > promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party 
> > > while in office.
> > > AdvertisementMinutes of the meeting on January 11, 1996, of the New 
> > > Party's Chicago chapter read as follows: 
> > > Barack Obama, candidate for State Senate in the 13th Legislative 
> > > District, gave a statement to the membership and answered questions. He 
> > > signed the New Party "Candidate Contract" and requested an endorsement 
> > > from the New Party. He also joined the New Party.
> > > Consistent with this, a roster of the Chicago chapter of the New 
> > > Party from early 1997 lists Obama as a member, with January 11, 1996, 
> > > indicated as the date he joined.
> > > Knowing that Obama disguised his New Party membership helps make 
> > > sense of his questionable handling of the 2008 controversy over his ties 
> > > to ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now). 
> > > During his third debate with John McCain, Obama said that the "only" 
> > > involvement he'd had with ACORN was to represent the group in a lawsuit 
> > > seeking to compel Illinois to implement the National Voter Registration 
> > > Act, or motor-voter law. The records of Illinois ACORN and its 
> > > associated union clearly contradict that assertion, as I show in my 
> > > political biography of the president, Radical-in-Chief: Barack Obama and 
> > > the Untold Story of American Socialism.
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to