On 08/18/2012 07:03 PM, authfriend wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@...> wrote: >> On 08/18/2012 05:42 PM, authfriend wrote: >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote: >>>> On 08/18/2012 11:33 AM, authfriend wrote: >>>>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" <richard@> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> So, it's all about Robin. >>>>> Actually none of it, nothing in any of those three posts, is >>>>> about Robin. You got fooled; Bhairitu got fooled; let's see >>>>> how many others do. >>>>> >>>> Well gee Willy, I guess if Judy sez that it must be "true". >>>> That despite the fact that the post I quoted had the word >>>> "Robin" in it some 47 times. Guess Judy must have read it >>>> as "Tobin" (or did she read it at all)? :-D >>> Somehow I don't think az expected that Bhairitu would be >>> one of the folks who would fall for the gag, but I could >>> have told az he might, given his propensity to believe in >>> nutty conspiracy theories. >>> >>> Still, it's hard to fathom how anybody with two brain cells >>> to rub together could have read even just the first >>> paragraph and thought it was about Robin. Heck, the second >>> sentence in the first paragraph should have been enough to >>> clue folks in that something wasn't kosher, even if their >>> reading skills were so deficient as to prevent them from >>> being able to decode Robin's message. >>> >>> The real stunner, however, is Bhairitu's claim above, that >>> the appearance of Robin's name in the post is enough to >>> demonstrate that it's about Robin. >>> >>> I mean, it boggles the mind. You just wouldn't expect that >>> kind of stupidity from someone who had managed to make a >>> solid career for themselves. A few highlights: >>> >>> Bhairitu found employment as a musician at various clubs in the Village, as >>> well as earning acting roles in film. His made his debut on the silver >>> screen in Abel Ferrara's China Girl, for which he also wrote the end-credit >>> song "Midnight." Bhairitu went on to collaborate with Ferrara on several >>> film and music projects, including: Bad Lieutenant, in which Bhairitu >>> played Jesus Christ and co-wrote the end-credits song; Body Snatchers, >>> which featured the song "I Want You Back"; and The Funeral, which saw >>> Bhairitu co-starring with Christopher Walken, Isabella Rosselini, Benicio >>> del Toro and Vincent Gallo. >>> >>> Bhairitu then co-starred in the off-Broadway show A Minor Incident with >>> legendary songwriter Carole King, who was making her stage debut in the >>> play. The two collaborated on songs for her Capitol Records release City >>> Streets, including the song "I Can't Stop Thinking About You," which >>> Bhairitu co-wrote and plays guitar and performs backing vocals on. It was >>> on stage with Carole King at London's Royal Albert Hall that Bhairitu was >>> spotted by the producers of a new West End musical Buddy: The Buddy Holly >>> Story. >>> >>> Buddy opened to rave reviews on 12 October 1989, at The Victoria Palace >>> Theater. Bhairitu's turn in the title role of Buddy Holly earned him a >>> nomination for the Laurence Olivier Award for Outstanding Performance by an >>> Actor in a Musical. The following year, Buddy at Broadway's Shubert Theater >>> in New York, and Bhairitu was nominated for a Tony Award for his >>> performance, as well as winning the Theater World Award for Best Broadway >>> Debut. >>> >>> After Buddy, Bhairitu appeared in the films Fathers & Sons, with Jeff >>> Goldblum, and as Jesus Christ opposite Harvey Keitel in Abel Ferrara's Bad >>> Lieutenant, for which he also performed and co-wrote the title song, "Bad >>> Lieutenant" with Ferrara. Bhairitu also appeared as Gene Vincent opposite >>> Donal Logue (as Eddie Cochran) in the play Be-Bop-A-Lula at Hollywood's >>> famed Theater/Theater before returning to the London stage for the 25th >>> anniversary revival of Hair at the Old Vic, in the role of Berger. >>> >> That might have been a fun career but it wasn't mine. > Your name appears in it 11 times (it's much shorter than az's > post). > >> I don't know of anyone really named Bhairitu. > It originally said "Barry," but I replaced it with Bhairitu > because that's the name you use here. > > <snip> >> Judy goes further into the ozone. Here is the first paragraph >> she is talking about: >> >> Robin W Carlsen has spoken, but it's impossible to decode his incoherent >> message. Perhaps he's saying that all any child needs is a big dose of >> television every day. Then again, he might be babbling that he was chosen by >> God as the trustee of His wishes and desires. Let's get down to brass tacks: >> It is appalling to me that he has managed to ignore compromise and focus >> solely on his personal agenda. And let me tell you, he all but forces his >> underlings to make our lives a living hell. Interestingly, Robin's >> underlings don't much seem to mind being given such querulous orders. I >> guess it's hard to free chauvinistic, pompous luftmenschen from the chains >> they revere. A related observation is that there's something fishy about >> Robin's insults. I think he's up to something, something beer-guzzling and >> perhaps even shameless. >> >> Now who is that about? > Not Robin. The only sentences that could conceivably > apply to Robin are the first (if one has poor reading > comprehension) and the next-to-last (a matter of opinion, > and very vague to boot).
Bullshit. You really must think people are stupid here, Judy. Obviously the paragraph is about Robin. You might as well claim the posts never existed. Maybe you and Robin ought to link up. You seem to be birds of a feather. :-D > > Look at the second sentence: Where has Robin said anything > about children and television? Let alone that he's been > chosen by God for anything? He believes God disappeared > from the world before he was born. He isn't chauvinistic-- > to the contrary--he's not a luftmensch, and he doesn't > drink. He has no "underlings" and doesn't force anybody > to do anything. Nor has any "compromise" been proposed to > him. It's just babbling. az has gathered bits and pieces > of text about other people, pasted them together, and > replaced the names with "Robin." That's your interpretation which you are making up for your convenience so you can look like you're winning. We all know you hate to lose, Lucy, I mean Judy. :-D > > The rest of it--and the other two posts--were done the > same way. They were a *gag*, Bhairitu. > >> Maybe Judy is confused with some other post. After all she is >> getting on in years so maybe the ol' memory and eyes ain't so >> good. > My memory's better than yours, and I have less trouble > reading than you do (obviously; this is a case in point). Wow, what a pretentious claim. :-D > >> But it really doesn't matter does it because my post was about >> cult leaders. Didn't name anyone in particular. Maybe she >> read my post and thought it was AZ's. > You've forgotten which post of yours I was responding to. > It wasn't that one. Figures. > > But that post clearly included Robin in its characterizations. > "This kind of sociopathic behavior" could only apply to the > behavior described in az's post that you quoted (which, > however, wasn't Robin's behavior). Again you can bend your interpretation to whatever works for your dig. > > Bhairitu, you're in a hole. Best stop digging. In your dreams, Judy. Now back to your room and get your meds on the way.
