I have looked all over the PEAR website and can't find any reference to yogic flying - can you post the link to the reference?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > > > I beleve they lost their funding through princeton so they had to go > > independent. Hence marketing the randomometer thingie I suspect, to keep > > raising funds. > > That must be it, nice to know I'm not dreaming these things. > > > L > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > That's weird. The PEAR website says that they DO find a consistent > > > > change during large Yogic Flying assemblies, but in the opposite > > > > direction from what is observed with other world events. > > > > > > Yeah, if you flip a coin a hundred times you get apparent anomalies > > > that disappear over time hence why they didn't get any results > > > from the course I enquired about. And there is so much yogic > > > "flying" going on that there shouldn't be any randomness at all! > > > > > > I see they are still at it though, I remember them giving up a few years > > > ago. > > > > > > > > > > L. > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually Dean Radin of the Noetic Institute did some back in the > > > > > > day, or so I recall. > > > > > > > > > > > > The people who used to work at the Princeton Engineering Anomalies > > > > > > Research (PEAR) group got into the business of marketing a home > > > > > > "real random number" generator so that you too, could participate > > > > > > in their global research project and I believe they worked with > > > > > > Radin and with Orme-Johnson of MUM on a project in Fairfield some > > > > > > years back. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://icrl.org/ > > > > > > > > > > Yes, the project was abandoned I recall, for the usual reason with > > > > > paranormal research, that of non-repeatabiltity. Sooner or later > > > > > the apparent anomalies disappear into the background noise and you > > > > > get left with everyday randomness. Which is what has happened with > > > > > ME experiments I think, if they ever had any good results really! > > > > > > > > > > I wrote to the princeton conciousness group once, I had been on > > > > > a WPA and was interested if they had any unexplained blips for > > > > > the time the course was on. They hadn't. I was very sceptical > > > > > by then but there's no harm in trying and they were most interested > > > > > in the concept of the Marshy effect. Ah well you've got to try > > > > > but without a mechanism for how it would only affect brains in a > > > > > "coherence creating" manner without affecting anything else it's > > > > > going to be a tough sell. > > > > > > > > > > > L > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" > > > > > > <fintlewoodlewix@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <LEnglish5@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Yifu" <yifuxero@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes...from Wired, Sept 2012: > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > "But now scientists at the Australian National University > > > > > > > > > have introduced a technique for generating 5.7 billion truly > > > > > > > > > random values per second. They do it by harnessing the > > > > > > > > > fundamental uncertainity of the universe. Their technique > > > > > > > > > measures quantum phenomena in a box completely devoid of > > > > > > > > > photons, where ghostly virtual particles randomly burble in > > > > > > > > > and out of existence 24/7. "God does not play dice," Einstein > > > > > > > > > famously quipped in response to evidence that randomness > > > > > > > > > rules the cosmos. Luckily, he was wrong". (Wired article by > > > > > > > > > Jonathon Keats). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There have been devices purporting to generate "real" random > > > > > > > > numbers available for years. It is possible that this > > > > > > > > particular one is "more random" than the others, but using > > > > > > > > radioactive decay as the source for random numbers has been > > > > > > > > used for years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The big question for us is what affect do super siddhi brains > > > > > > > have on the ability to generate random numbers? Ought to do > > > > > > > something if it can create "positivity" at a distance. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is the sort of experiment MUM could do and then come up > > > > > > > with an explanation as to why some things are affected and not > > > > > > > others. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Using virtual particles, which is what they are apparently > > > > > > > > doing, seems pretty cool though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > L. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
