http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zHmeTeLgMY
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> wrote: > > OK so I get the formula. I say something that isn't what I would say and you > dance around why you said them. So it is all good for you even though I > would never say your days are numbered or that I was going to humble you and > would never even mean that which is something I know because I am, after all, > myself. > > You are fucking with me Robin and you got my goat a little and you even got > some troll friends to pile on. And for them perhaps your post was just > perfect. Sorry to spoil your little troll party with my actual POV. > > I read you as a wordy Ravi now Robin. Same intention. You are as spiteful > as Judy and you've had your little fun at my expense. I hope you are sitting > smug in your trollness. Is smells like a barnyard to me. > > If you wanted to "send me up" without being an asshole there were many ways > to do it. Your choosing this way is most telling. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@> wrote: > > > > Admission: some poetic license on: Your days are numbered. And the humble > > thing, that too was hyperbole. I admit to pushing the envelope a little > > there. But still IN THE MAIN my two posts represent your fundamental > > response to Robin Carlsen--inside the polemic of our relationship, Curtis. > > Find some other ones. This is getting fun. Because if you cite examples > > they must be sufficient in their cumulative effect to vitiate the essential > > truth of the two posts. Else MY IRONY HAS FAILED. > > > > Good start. Keep going. Find some other ones. These ones separated out from > > the whole seem to suggest Robin was pressing things a little. But if you > > take the GIST of the posts, Curtis, they are you. I could not ENTIRELY be > > sober there; else people WOULD REALLY BELIEVE IT WAS YOU. So the > > exaggeration WAS TO PROTECT YOU. > > > > It all works, Curtis. Robin sending you up, but making sure at the same > > time that in the end it was not you. But yet IT WAS YOU. > > > > Let's keep it going, Curtis. > > > > Robin > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > You just don't get it Robin. No one likes to be mispresented, or > > > > > impersonated. I think it 's pretty simple. > > > > > > > > No, YOU don't get it, Steve. That isn't the issue. Curtis is > > > > within his rights to ask Robin to stop. Curtis is not within > > > > his rights (ethically, at any rate) to claim Robin has > > > > misrepresented the kind of thing he might say about Robin. > > > > > > Really? So I have threatened Robin that his days on FFL are numbered? > > > That I will humble him? I have to make a case for how he misrepresented > > > me to get him to stop? > > > > > > You don't get the issue Judy. You are following Robin's lead to coerce me > > > into going point by point to refute his made-up bullshit. As if that is > > > the main point of why it might not be cool to make up shit and sign other > > > people's names. > > > > > > Judy, your eyes are brown on this one. Guess why. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "maskedzebra" <maskedzebra@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Curtis, > > > > > > > > > > > > Take the two instances where I have attempted to represent your > > > > > > voice, > > > > > and specify which passages in either post you feel are untruthful; > > > > > that > > > > > is, you would not say what I have you saying. "There were many > > > > > statements in what you wrote that I wouldn't want anyone to think I > > > > > had > > > > > generated". If there are such statements, this tends to defeat my > > > > > argument. I would like some examples. Once you provide these, I will > > > > > arrange--I am sure either Rick and Alex can do this--to head each of > > > > > these posts with: > > > > > > > > > > > > ROBIN PRETENDS HE IS CURTIS. HE ISN'T REALLY. NONE OF WHAT FOLLOWS > > > > > > IS > > > > > WHAT CURTIS WOULD DREAM OF SAYING. THIS POST HAS NOTHING DO WITH > > > > > CURTIS. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure this will clear up the problem, won't it, Curtis? > > > > > > > > > > > > You are such a sweet and loveable guy. > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh, by the way, I do believe I represented your sentiments exactly. > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to hear you refute what I have said so I can imagine > > > > > > how > > > > > I could have been wrong here. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you would not have said (in principle) what i have you saying > > > > > > then > > > > > it means the irony did not--to use a Share word--"fly". > > > > > > > > > > > > If you can sincerely show me examples of statements--in either > > > > > post--which are false in their attempt to speak in your voice, I need > > > > > to > > > > > see them. Because, to repeat myself for the third time, it means I did > > > > > not succeed in what I attempted. > > > > > > > > > > > > Now let us love one another, Curtis. I have followed you very > > > > > > closely > > > > > for over a year. What i said in both posts for me was Curtis all the > > > > > way. Just not as witty, not as hard-hitting, not as clever, not as > > > > > colorful. > > > > > > > > > > > > For me, everything is forever. > > > > > > > > > > > > Robin > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > > > curtisdeltablues@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do I really have to ask you not to do this very douchey thing > > > > > > > Robin? > > > > > really? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK then I'll ask. Please don't sign my name at the bottom of straw > > > > > men versions of my POV out of respect for the fact that most of us > > > > > just > > > > > skim posts within our otherwise busy days and it is hard enough to > > > > > keep > > > > > track without this in the mix. There were many statements in what you > > > > > wrote that I wouldn't want anyone to think I had generated. If you > > > > > want > > > > > to play fast and lose with accuracy and just assume other people will > > > > > keep up, please do it at your expense in the future,not mine. This > > > > > shit > > > > > we put up on the Internet is FOREVER. It carries some > > > > > responsibilities. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
