> <snip> > > Although I rarely read Share's posts, much less reply > > to them, I'm going to do what I know that Judy (our > > official Upholder Of Truth And Honesty) will not and > > point out a few discrepancies in the account above. > > authfriend: > Poor Barry's lost in confusion again because he doesn't > read my posts. > > <snip> > > I didn't read all of the responses in the thread, but glancing > > through them briefly I saw *none* that "slammed Share." > > Not a one. I challenge her to produce the one or ones that did. > > > Yeah, why don't you just leave her the fuck alone? There's > no earthly reason why she needs to respond to your dimwit > "challenges." Go wave your pathetic dick at somebody else. > Yeah, just leave Share alone - who do you think you are, her Uncle Tantra? And while I'm at it, leave all the other gals on FFL alone too - they're way out of your league, Turqy! LoL!
> > I'm posting this as a reminder of the thing that happens so often > > here, and that I think that happened in this case, and has warped > > Share's memory of events. A number of people responded to > > her posting of Hagelin's silly ideas by making fun of his *ideas* > > or of *him*. Why do I get the feeling that Share interpreted > > this as "slamming her?" > > > Barry, NOBODY CARES. Trust me on this. Take a few placebos, > you'll feel much better. > Then, come back to pay your lost wagers!