--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" lurkernomore20002000@ wrote: > <snip> > > Raunch, > > You have on at least on one occasion slandered someone, and when > > it was pointed out that you made an entirely inaccurate statement > > about this person you refused to back down or issue an apology. > > So when you talk about how we must be honest with ourselves and > > others, I find this to be empty rhetoric on your part. > > Oooopsie: > > "Since there's such a big fuss about my having used Sal's > comments about Jennifer Blair as an example of bullying, I > found and read Sal's entire thread 'Email going around FF.' > I see that I commented to "Susan wayback71 on the thread > by posting a link making fun of Sal's objection to milk and > cookies. When I used Sal's thread as an example of bullying, > all I remembered about it was that Sal lobbed one of her > signature stink bombs criticizing a fundraiser for Jennifer, > a lovely person, who lost everything in the Depot fire, as > did many other people I know and care about, Max Sutherland, > Marty Brodeur, and Duncan McMasters just to name a few. For > the sake of accuracy I should have looked up the thread > before posting about it."--raunchydog, 3/6/12
This sounds like someone too proud to make a clear unequivocal apology, which is what one might expect from after clear unequivocal misrepresentation.I mean you can find a half of an apology there if you look hard for it.So maybe with this "doubling down" you refer to at some point, maybe together those two constitute an apology, but I doubt it. But thank you for looking this up. > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/305686 > > Not only did Sal not take back her slur on Jennifer > for serving milk and cookies at her fundraiser, BTW, > she doubled down on it. >
