Nope still not catching on. Maybe all that tight latex has stopped circulation to brain cells?
Ah yes, I did finally figure out ML. But thinking if ShockMeister of all Shockmeisters Howard Stern can do it, I can do it. By which I mean, he once told Rolling Stone magazine that there's something he'll never make fun of, TM. And someone he'll never make fun of. Now YOUR turn to figure out (-: ________________________________ From: laughinggull108 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, October 7, 2012 7:44 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: ATT: Share (was Best TM Rumor to Judy Good morning Share. Sorry to butt in here but I can never pass on a good teaching opportunity. This is what I meant by "Turn away, turn away, it's hideous." Now are you catching on? Did you figure out the ML shop opening on the square? Have a wonderful day! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > Well, you are relentless, I'll give you that. IMO you misrepresented me > when in response to my apology you replied with a statement contained in > quotation marks. Perhaps you were quoting yourself from some other > writing? Or quoting someone else in a galaxy far far away? > > I would like to hear your explanation of that particular use of quotation > marks. > > > > ________________________________ > From: authfriend <authfriend@...> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Saturday, October 6, 2012 2:36 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: ATT: Share (was Best TM Rumor to Judy and PS to > laughingG) > > >  > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > <snip> > > > Later when I apologized to everyone, including you, you > > > responded by misrepresenting me. In what I deem a sneaky > > > and dirty fighting way. > > > > I never misrepresented you, Share. > > Share, when I read this again, I realized how revealing > what you say is. You are so allergic to reality, > especially concerning yourself, that *being told the > truth* seems to you to be "sneaky" and "dirty fighting" > and "misrepresentational"--no matter how faithful it is > to the reality. > > Forums that keep archives of what has been posted are > different than what happens in daily life. There's a > record of one's interactions, of what one has said to > others. One can often get away with slanting and > distorting the facts thereof in daily life because > there is no such record, and folks' memories are not > always perfect. > > On a forum that keeps archives, *you cannot edit what > you've said after the fact*. You can delete a post you > wish you had never made, but if someone has already > responded to it and quoted it, that isn't going to > help. > > Editing the reality of what you've said on a forum like > this to make it conform to what you would like to have > said is much more difficult when there is a searchable > record of the posts. >
