--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > And here she goes again: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > > > > <anartaxius@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Always you are the honest one. > > > > > > > > Yeah, sorry you have a problem with the person you're > > > > arguing with being honest. > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > If this were so unambiguous why the firestorm, both politically and > > > > > in the news? Obviously some is pure politics, but it seems it was the > > > > > news organisations like CNN that started poking around in the story > > > > > and undermining the administration's waffling on the issue. > > > > > > > > Disingenuous question. As you know, what I've said was > > > > unambiguous was Obama's Rose Garden statement as to > > > > the Benghazi attack being an act of terror. > > > > I don't think Judy or Raunch know (or want to know) the meaning of the word > > 'generalization', which is what Obama did, on purpose. Obama made a > > generalization in the Rose Garden, he did not specifically say *the > > Benghazi attack* was a terrorist attack per se! Simple really, but > > partisans have a hard time seeing straight sometimes. > > > Yep. > > I don't know much about US politics, but from what I have read, I told you I > read Xeno, he made a very general remark about the use of words and > diplomatic phrases in politics, which was general enough and true, and yet > she used it for another put-down, accusing him for being disingenuous, and > insinuating he is dishonest. IMO Xeno is one of the most polite and authentic > posters here, together with Share. If I see how some people react to them, I > don't have to even try.
Ouch.....
