You see, this supports my premise that there are no original thoughts.  

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@> wrote:
> >
> > I will admit, whether an original thought or not, I got a big kick out of 
> > trying to wrap my mind around the question "Does God Evolve?" 
> 
> "The truth itself is nothing else than how the composite natures of the 
> organic actualities of the world obtain adequate representation in the divine 
> nature. Such representations compose the `consequent nature' of God, which 
> evolves in its relationship to the evolving world without derogation to the 
> eternal completion of its primordial conceptual nature."
> Alfred North Whitehead 
>  
>  ________________________________
> >  From: Susan <wayback71@>
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 8:45 AM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] In praise of Barry (Re: Coup de foudre)
> >  
> > 
> >   
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, khazana108 <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is one thing I like about Barry: that he tells this story. He is 
> > > almost certainly being ridiculed for it, and he knows it, but he doesn't 
> > > care. He really doesn't care. See how little guarded he is. In this case 
> > > it is particularly clear, that he simply shares this, very personal 
> > > moment, just the way he experienced it, and just shares his own 
> > > reflections, as if he would be telling this to his best friend! There is 
> > > no hidden agenda, no cynicism, or irony, he simply shares this moment of 
> > > transcendence IN the world, the awe he experienced. 
> > > 
> > > And I think he does this here in general: this is Barry's MO. He has some 
> > > kind of recognition, some truth he recognizes, and then he throws it at 
> > > us, not really caring too much how people react, in take-it-or-leave-it 
> > > style. He has this inner independence, and that's a great thing I think.  
> > > He could be more sensitive, to not hurt people, sure. But he is almost 
> > > completely innocent in this. Now take it or leave it.
> > 
> > Well said.  I agree with this 100%. And this is why I look forward to 
> > reading Barry's posts.  He puts his ideas out there - are some are terrific 
> > and interesting.  Some not so much to me, but so what?
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Today's koan:  Maharishi explains there's 100% determinism, 100% 
> > > > free will.  I love these paradoxes!
> > > > 
> > > > Gangaji said, and I'm paraphrasing:  if you think you're the doer, 
> > > > then it's better if you do what you think is right to do.
> > > > 
> > > > B, what comes out of the jello first, sound or light?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >  From: Bhairitu <noozguru@>
> > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > > Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 3:06 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Coup de foudre
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >   
> > > > On 10/22/2012 07:59 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
> > > > > I had an interesting experience this morning, interesting primarily
> > > > > because I've only had such an experience a few times in my life, and
> > > > > it's been a long time since the last one.
> > > > >
> > > > > I was out walking in my neighborhood and saw a woman approaching on a
> > > > > bakfiets (a bicycle with a passenger compartment on the front, similar
> > > > > to the Babboe I posted about earlier). She had two small kids -- 
> > > > > boys, I
> > > > > think -- in the compartment, but to tell the truth I'm not sure they
> > > > > were boys because I couldn't take my eyes off of her face. I found her
> > > > > incredibly beautiful. Not in a supermodel or actress sort of way, 
> > > > > more a
> > > > > "Wow...this is a very real and interesting person" sort of way. And 
> > > > > not
> > > > > in the least in a lustful sort of way. She just instantly captured my
> > > > > interest, so I smiled. She smiled back, and then pedaled past me and
> > > > > turned down a street parallel to mine.
> > > > >
> > > > > Unwilling to part with that delightful second of appreciation, I 
> > > > > turned
> > > > > to watch her pedal away. She turned to look at me, too. We both smiled
> > > > > again, and then she pedaled on.
> > > > >
> > > > > That's all. You were maybe expecting her to have stopped and asked me 
> > > > > to
> > > > > feel her ass?  :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > That short interaction may not sound like much of a moment to others,
> > > > > but to me it's of interest because several times in my life such a
> > > > > moment of mutual recognition and appreciation has led to wonderful and
> > > > > memorable love affairs.
> > > > >
> > > > > One of those times, interestingly enough, occurred on an ATR course of
> > > > > at the old Cobb Mountain TM facility. It was the first day, and never
> > > > > having been there before I was walking around checking things out. She
> > > > > walked by me, I got that powerful "flash of recognition" feeling, and
> > > > > then she'd walked past. No smiles this time; there wasn't really time.
> > > > > But the flash was enough to stop me in my tracks and cause me to turn
> > > > > around and look at her walking away. But she wasn't walking away. She
> > > > > had stopped and turned around and was looking at me, too. We didn't 
> > > > > hook
> > > > > up on that course, but we did later, and it was memorable indeed, at
> > > > > least from my side. Lovely woman.
> > > > >
> > > > > So I never ignore such moments. I may never see this woman in Leiden
> > > > > again, but if I don't it really doesn't matter. In my experience such
> > > > > moments are timeless, in the sense that they quite possibly cut across
> > > > > the boundaries of one incarnation and intrude with memories of 
> > > > > another.
> > > > > If we run into one another again in this incarnation, I'll get to see
> > > > > what happens. If not, that's what future incarnations are for. :-)
> > > > 
> > > > You hate jyotish but then I wouldn't be surprised if your horoscope 
> > > > shows a "sanyasi yoga" or at least a weak 7th lord which means that 
> > > > your 
> > > > life isn't set up for long term relationships such as marriage.   And 
> > > > if 
> > > > you attempted marriage it might well end in divorce.  One of the most 
> > > > common questions astrologers get is "will I ever be married?"  And in 
> > > > every case where that question came up I could see that the horoscope 
> > > > didn't support it.  Which is why they asked the question in the first 
> > > > place.  That doesn't mean that you shouldn't try but it is getting a 
> > > > little late in the day. ;-)
> > > > 
> > > > I was thinking about the free will and pre-destiny issue the other day 
> > > > and thinking that one problem is that people think of the transcendent 
> > > > like it is air.  Try thinking of it as jello and we are being wiggled 
> > > > around by its shaking.  That's what we experience as "life."  In that 
> > > > context the next thought you have was predetermined at the inception of 
> > > > the universe when the fundamental tone was struck.  We are nothing but 
> > > > part of the overtones.  I had that thought years ago and learned a 
> > > > while 
> > > > back that physicists labeled it "string theory" in it is like a string 
> > > > being struck.  Makes sense to me.  But enjoy life anyway as if there is 
> > > > free will.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to