--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>  
> In a message dated 9/4/05 6:51:47 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> You  know, a moment's reflection should tell you
> that, given they knew how many  people there were
> without transportation, and that they *did* have
> plans  to deal with the problem, it isn't very
> likely that there were better  solutions of the kind
> you suggest that they hadn't already  considered
> and rejected for good reason, or that were clearly
> not  feasible in the first place.
> 
> They know what their resources are and  what's
> possible and what isn't; you don't.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> You know it works both ways. Nobody, outside of the most inner
> loops, knows exactly what is going on but there sure are a lot of 
> questions for  everybody to ask of everybody in Government from 
> local to state to federal.  Nobody knows how factual any of the 
> reporting is or if anybody that makes a  report has all of the 
> facts and a truly clear perception of the reality of  everything 
> that is going on. <What I have found particularly disturbing in  
> this whole tragedy is the immediate politicization from day one. 
> And the intense  personal attacks  while people are trying to deal 
> with a difficult and  emotional situation. Everyone has been trying 
> to play a game of gotcha. <As  Michael Chertoff said and Bush said 
> from the first day, they are concentrating  their efforts on 
> getting the job done  and there will be plenty of time to  analyze 
> what went well and what went wrong and where to affix blame later 
> on  once the job is complete. <Now I know you well enough Judy to 
> take that  as dodging tough questions but it's not. It's keeping 
> focus on doing the job.  <No doubt there will be investigations 
> down the road to get any and all  answers.

You're missing the point, again.  The initial
criticisms weren't primarily about blame for
what happened but for Bush's unthinkably callous
public response.  That isn't something you go
back and analyze later; it was mainly symbolic,
but the insensitivity was intolerable.  And again,
it was conservatives criticizing him as well as 
liberals.

Then when the situation in New Orleans became more
and more evident, the criticism was primarily 
about prodding the administration to act more
quickly *right then* because people were dying
from the lack of response.  That's not political
either, obviously.

Now that the worst of the emergency seems to be
past, the criticism has primarily to do with getting
rid of the incompetents like Chertoff and Brown to
ensure the rest of the relief effort isn't bungled--
or, God forbid, in case of another disaster coming
on the heels of this one.  So *that* isn't political.

The *political* criticism, on this forum, at least,
has come primarily from the right-wingers who are
trying to defend the administration and can think
of no way to do so except by trying to shift the
blame onto the Democratic governor and mayor.

That's not to say there haven't been some who
have been making the case for Bush being
responsible for the levees not being fixed and
so on--that kind of thing *can* wait.

If we could feel confident that the administration
would engage in some honest self-examination and
allow its actions to be investigated thoroughly
once the crisis period was over, folks might be
more willing to wait.

But we know from long experience that this
administration has never been willing to take
responsibility for its mistakes, nor even allow
them to be investigated properly.

> Even Clinton's former FEMA director indicated that you just don't  
> anticipate all that has happened and be completely prepared for it 
> as  is in this case.< In short, nobody likes what we are seeing 
> played out before  our eyes, but then nobody has all of the facts 
> yet either. And as Jesse Jackson  says, be careful when you point a 
> finger because there are three more pointing  back at you.

Yes, I'm sure the right-wingers will eventually
find a way to point fingers at Clinton and Witt,
and probably Jackson as well for good measure.





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to