--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <lurkernomore20002000@...> wrote: > > Hey Emily, > I am sorry that you are running low on posts. I hope you don't post > out. > I also want to qualify my comment with something Raunchy has brought up, > about not commenting if you don't have any skin in the game. And I > don't feel like I have a lot of skin in this game. > But, I do want to say, that if one steps back a little and allows for > what is sometimes called, "poetic license", then maybe Share's comments > take on a different perspective. > Let's take for example this term "psychological rape". ( I hope I have > the term right, but you know what I am referring to) > I knew what Share meant. I guess if you want, you can take great > offense at the term, and pick it apart. On the other hand, do we not > as a matter of course here, often use such loaded terms? > But even aside from that, I felt the term could be a reasonable > description of the way Robin often interacts with people. > But that's the way he often is, and from his point of view, he feels he > sees a blind spot that person may not be aware of. So, why the big deal > about it. > Or, does Share see a cult mindset among some of the people with whom > Robin has a greater affinity? > Well, maybe she does. Maybe she ascribes to a looser definition of what > defines "cult behavior". > At any rate, I am not sure what is wrong with telling her that you > disagree with her conclusions and moving on. Or after a time, moving > on.
Very sensible Steve. A person could fall in love with you based on this post alone. Not that I've fallen in love with you, you understand. Well, even if I had fallen in love with you, there's nothing wrong with that, is there? Good on ya'. > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@> > wrote: > > > So:  You do believe that wts survives here and you do believe that > healing of the wts cult has taken place since November 11th?  Huh? >  These two premises are oppositional; one does not support the > other.  Do you or  don't you believe that there is a wts cult in > operation here on FFL?  Yes or No.  > > > > The "healing" question was a change in context and a distraction by > you.....the bottom line here is, Sharester, that I believe you believe a > faction of FFL (those you identify) are involved in a cult, that you > have termed wts.  I disagree, for the record, and will not play this > game with you in the future.  >
