--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote: > > Your sincerest apology accepted and me offering the same to you. More below > inline. > > > ________________________________ > From: Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2012 8:16 PM > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested > > >  > Share, > > 1) we aren't communicating with each other...we're communicating at each > other.  If you want to respond to any post of mine, please do.  I will > continue to respond to posts of yours that I choose to.  I am letting go of > wanting you to discuss why you think I am part of a fantasy construct of > yours entitled wts.  I'm leaving the door open for you. > > Ok, Emily, but my question was about our continuing to communicate with each > other. So more about the future rather than the past. > > When you leave the ster off of Share, then I believe you when you say you are > leaving the door open. Sharester has a bit of a negative connotation I > think. > > Hopefully you see the door as open for us both and not just for me. > > > 2) the same benefits one receives from choosing to read any post here on FFL > - or,  if you prefer, "I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on > FFL would come of it." > > And what would those same benefits be, from your POV, Emily? This is what > I'm interested in. And actually what I prefer is for you to use your own > words. >
Just me, RD, butting in on a public forum using my own words to ask why Emily's sentence in quotes caused you to say you prefer she use her own words. It seemed important enough for you to say it, but I don't understand why that is. Can you elaborate? You're asking her to say what the same benefits are from reading post on FFL so, it stands to reason that you could say what it means for you to say you prefer her to use her own words. When she put a sentence in quotes "trigger" something in you? What was it? Did it piss you off? It's O.K. if you ignore me, and it's O.K. if it pissed you off. All I'm asking is if you're willing to drill down a little deeper into what caused you to ask this of her. If it pissed you off, it's O.K. but examining why it pissed you off could be a liberating experience. Ultimately all any of us do is project our own issues on others and that's O.K. What's at the heart of it for me is asking what is it within myself that causes me to to project on to others, not what they do to *make* me feel the way I feel. No one can *make* me feel anything...how I respond to others is entirely my responsibility. > > 3) This post IS my viable next step! > > Yay! > > > > ________________________________ > From: Share Long <sharelong60@...> > To: "fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com" <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Sunday, December 2, 2012 4:39 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] 3 ques to Judy Emily & anyone else interested > > >  > 1. Do you think that any benefits can come from Judy Share and Emily > continuing to communicate with each other? > 2. If yes, what do you think are the benefits that can come of it? > 3. What do you think would be a viable next step to move closer to those > benefits with a minimum of what's not beneficial? > > I began to think of these questions while driving to the Dome this evening. > I have not discussed them with anyone. > I look forward to any answers especially to numbers 2 and 3. > > In some ways I don't think the answer to number 1 matters. > > My answers: > 2. I hope that more peace and enjoyment for those on FFL would come of it. > 3. This post IS my viable next step! > 1. I'm not sure. But I'm open to the possibility of yes. > > > I'm hoping for some fun answers too (-: > Thank you everyone for your time and thoughts and caring. >
