--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <lurkernomore20002000@>
> wrote:
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater <no_reply@>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Then talk TO him, don't talk ABOUT him. Grow a spine and
>>> address people directly, not through others. Put yourself
>>> out there where it can be a little bit scary and take a
>>> chance. Your hazy generalizations of how sorry you are or
>>> how misunderstood or how silly you think you can be at
>>> times just aren't cutting the mustard. Get out the steak
>>> knife and go for some real meat. Stop playing the damsel
>>> and GET REAL. You don't think I 'm going to take flak for
>>> this post? But at least I'm telling you how I really feel
>>> and showing you who I am, it doesn't come without
>>> consequences (especially here). Just look at the invective
>>> Robin is getting dealt right now. Now shit or get off the
>>> pot, woman.
>>
>> Ann, these are certainly nice sentiments. But real dialogue is
>> generally in short supply here.
>>
>> And really, I don't know if I would identify Ravi as one with
>> whom one could have a meaningful dialogue.
>
> Hmm. Ann doesn't seem to be saying anything about dialogue
> per se. Maybe you should read what she wrote again?
>
No she does not, but assuming Share wrote directly to Ravi, and he responded,
and they started an on-line conversation, that could be called an on-line
dialogue. A dialogue with Ravi, seems like an iffy proposition though. A
dialogue with Robin is more likely to continue with some meaningful content.
