--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think what you'd find if you looked into it is that > > > > > > > the higher the altar they've put Maharishi on, the > > > > > > > less time they've actually spent in his presence. > > > > > > > Judy has never even been in the same room with the > > > > > > > man, after 30+ years of devoted TM practice. > > > > > > > > > > > > You just disproved your own formula, because I've > > > > > > *never* put MMY on an altar. The rest of your > > > > > > rant is equally misapplied; I don't believe *any* > > > > > > of the things you (or Paul) attribute to me. > > > > > > Not one. > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, right, babe. That's why you couldn't > > > > > bring yourself to answer Shemp's questions > > > > > about whether you'd still have learned TM > > > > > if the TM movement of today was the one you > > > > > had run into 30 years ago. > > > > > > > > Complete non sequitur, sorry. > > > > > > > > Who are you trying to fool, Barry, other than > > > > yourself? > > > > > > Shemp posed a rather simple question to answer. > > > And I think that everyone here knows that your > > > answer, like theirs, would consist of one word, > > > containing only two letters. > > > > > > The fact that you cannot bring yourself to utter > > > that word speaks volumes about the pedestal on > > > which you have placed Maharishi. IMO, of course. > > > > And it's not that I want to "attack" Judy or "one-up" her...it's > > because I truly believe that this sort of dialogue should be > > happening in the TMO. And, to a certain extent, we on this > > newsgroup are connected to the TMO and they could benefit from that > > dialogue. > > Yet you won't fulfill my simple request to explain > the relevance of your question to what I had said in > the post you were responding to. > > Shemp, I think everyone here realizes, despite your > and Barry's best attempts at demonization, that I > haven't answered your question because it was > rhetorical, not a genuine request for information. > > Barry even suggests as much above when he says > everybody knows what my answer would be. So both > you and he are being disingenuous to pretend you > think I "can't bring myself" to answer. > > You can't start a dialogue by stating a given and > then insisting that folks accede to it.
so prove me and him wrong by answering the fucking question... ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/