--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > wrote:
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > wrote:
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB 
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I think what you'd find if you looked into it is that
> > > > > > > the higher the altar they've put Maharishi on, the
> > > > > > > less time they've actually spent in his presence.
> > > > > > > Judy has never even been in the same room with the
> > > > > > > man, after 30+ years of devoted TM practice.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > You just disproved your own formula, because I've
> > > > > > *never* put MMY on an altar.  The rest of your
> > > > > > rant is equally misapplied; I don't believe *any*
> > > > > > of the things you (or Paul) attribute to me.
> > > > > > Not one.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yeah, right, babe.  That's why you couldn't
> > > > > bring yourself to answer Shemp's questions
> > > > > about whether you'd still have learned TM 
> > > > > if the TM movement of today was the one you
> > > > > had run into 30 years ago.
> > > > 
> > > > Complete non sequitur, sorry.
> > > > 
> > > > Who are you trying to fool, Barry, other than
> > > > yourself?
> > > 
> > > Shemp posed a rather simple question to answer.
> > > And I think that everyone here knows that your
> > > answer, like theirs, would consist of one word,
> > > containing only two letters.
> > > 
> > > The fact that you cannot bring yourself to utter
> > > that word speaks volumes about the pedestal on
> > > which you have placed Maharishi.  IMO, of course.
> > 
> > And it's not that I want to "attack" Judy or "one-up" her...it's 
> > because I truly believe that this sort of dialogue should be 
> > happening in the TMO.  And, to a certain extent, we on this 
> > newsgroup are connected to the TMO and they could benefit from 
that 
> > dialogue.
> 
> Yet you won't fulfill my simple request to explain
> the relevance of your question to what I had said in
> the post you were responding to.
> 
> Shemp, I think everyone here realizes, despite your
> and Barry's best attempts at demonization, that I
> haven't answered your question because it was
> rhetorical, not a genuine request for information.
> 
> Barry even suggests as much above when he says
> everybody knows what my answer would be.  So both
> you and he are being disingenuous to pretend you
> think I "can't bring myself" to answer.
> 
> You can't start a dialogue by stating a given and
> then insisting that folks accede to it.


so prove me and him wrong by answering the fucking question...





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page
http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to