Starbuck's chai tea latte is made with a syrup, which annoys me.  They *were* a 
better place when they were small.  The independents are the best. 



>________________________________
> From: Ann <awoelfleba...@yahoo.com>
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 6:22 PM
>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Turq's Occult Theory Of What Motivates 
>Cyberstalkers
> 
>
>  
>
>
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@...  wrote:
>>
>> Right on! When they were small, they were better - I'm a "chai guy" - Oregon 
>> Chai - for me, tea has a less 'electric' buzz than coffee...
>
>Right on Doc. I'm a "chai guyess". Has to be a latte though. Starbucks chai's 
>are fine but I like to drink at the independent coffee shops. 
>> 
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
>> >
>> > Starbucks - terrible coffee.  No flavor, no nuance, no aroma, no taste.  
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > >________________________________
>> > > From: "doctordumbass@" 
>> > >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>> > >Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 2:35 PM
>> > >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Turq's Occult Theory Of What Motivates 
>> > >Cyberstalkers
>> > > 
>> > >
>> > >  
>> > >Speaking of addicts, drive past a Starbucks on a rainy workday morning at 
>> > >5:30 AM, and the cars are lined up around the building, waiting for the 
>> > >needle. Its pretty creepy! 
>> > >
>> > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> You are right, and I misstated your name and used the word "life" 
>> > >> instead of "like" - it was before I had experienced the psychoactive 
>> > >> effect of the coffee I drink every morning, like a good addict should. 
>> > >>  At least, that's the best excuse I can come up with for now.  
>> > >> I'm sorry.  
>> > >> 
>> > >> 
>> > >> 
>> > >> >________________________________
>> > >> > From: salyavin808 
>> > >> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>> > >> >Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 10:17 AM
>> > >> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Turq's Occult Theory Of What Motivates 
>> > >> >Cyberstalkers
>> > >> > 
>> > >> >
>> > >> >  
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn  wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> Not to worry, Carol.  I've been called creepy too.  
>> > >> >> Sal and Barry are exercising double standards - it's O.K. for them 
>> > >> >> to trash TM and TM-doers repeatedly, 
>> > >> >
>> > >> >Erm, who does this?
>> > >> >
>> > >> >but not O.K. for you to post a balanced review of your experience with 
>> > >> >Mr. Knapp and his counseling services.  Makes no sense at all. 
>> > >> > Glad you showed up here and post as much and about whatever 
>> > >> >you life as often as you like.  There is nothing but benefit 
>> > >> >to be gained by multiple perspectives.   
>> > >> >> 
>> > >> >> 
>> > >> >> 
>> > >> >> >________________________________
>> > >> >> > From: Carol 
>> > >> >> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>> > >> >> >Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 7:09 AM
>> > >> >> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Turq's Occult Theory Of What Motivates 
>> > >> >> >Cyberstalkers
>> > >> >> > 
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >  
>> > >> >> >Hey Saly..
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >Thanks for you analysis. But, like Barry, you know little and 
>> > >> >> >almost nothing about me or the situation.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >If you bothered to read before throwing out your analysis, maybe 
>> > >> >> >you could state some criticism that is factual and holds some 
>> > >> >> >weight. I'm not out to get anyone on my side. Regardless, as I 
>> > >> >> >stated to Barry, your impression is noted.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >As far as Knapp not being around to defend himself, he can come 
>> > >> >> >here and defend himself if he so desires; it's a public board. 
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >All that said, the Knapp discussion is pretty much dead at this 
>> > >> >> >point...except that you bring it up here.
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >Combining yours and Barry's labels toward me, I am a creepy loon. 
>> > >> >> >Loons fly, they don't creep. 
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >Happy 2013...
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >**************
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"  wrote:
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
>> > >> >> >> >
>> > >> >> >> > Since I'm obviously one of the people Barry is libeling with
>> > >> >> >> > the term "cyberstalker," 
>> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> I can remember when you used to work out what time Barry made
>> > >> >> >> his first post of the day, you'd then triumphantly post this fact
>> > >> >> >> as though it proved some point. Dead creepy behaviour, kind of 
>> > >> >> >> worrying you don't have the self-awareness to realise it. Maybe 
>> > >> >> >> Carol shouldn't take your analyses at face value?
>> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> But Carol is a bit creepy too, she turns up here simply to rubbish
>> > >> >> >> someone who isn't around to defend themselves to a bunch of
>> > >> >> >> people with - what? a presumed shared dislike of TM? Is that what
>> > >> >> >> this is about, TM gets criticised here and J Knapp does some 
>> > >> >> >> criticising too so therefore there must be something deficient 
>> > >> >> >> with
>> > >> >> >> TM critics? Or does she assume we are all good mates and is trying
>> > >> >> >> to drive a presumed wedge between anyone who might have TM-free 
>> > >> >> >> sympathies?
>> > >> >> >> 
>> > >> >> >> Whatever it is, it doesn't come across as a public service 
>> > >> >> >> announcement, more like some revenge fantasy. The only thing 
>> > >> >> >> that's obvious is that she needs more therapy to work out why she 
>> > >> >> >> behaves
>> > >> >> >> in this peculiar way. I fear that getting Judy on her side will 
>> > >> >> >> only entrench it, you don't find healthy closure from someone who
>> > >> >> >> has to work out what time her "enemies" get out of bed in the 
>> > >> >> >> morning when they live on the other side of the atlantic.
>> > >> >> >>
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> > 
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >> >
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> > 
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
> 
>
>

Reply via email to