--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Cliff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. No, TM would not have been able to save the world, no matter > what M did. I thought otherwise for many years, but now believe I > was far too naive. > 2. No, Amma doesn't have the organizational skills needed to > spread a technique globally. > 3. There is no one technique that can "save the world", and > therefore the Dalai Lama also cannot do it.
> Clear enough answers? Yes, thanks. I'm interested in what you say about being "too naive," though. Want to elaborate? Do you still think the world *could* be saved, or was that part of the naivete? If you do still think it could be saved, what do you think could save it? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
