--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > MMY is being explicit about the failure. You and > > > > > > > Barry are blaming him for it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But which of these two are you blaming him for? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. He thought it could be done, but he was wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. It *could* have been done, but he failed to do it.>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > Neither: > > > > > > 3. If it could be done, has he done it the right way? > > > > > > Answer: Half of what he did was genius. Half of what he did > > > > > > was .....well....stupid. > > > > > > This is the Enigma of Maharishi tha Rick often talks about. > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, but what I'm asking is whether you believe it > > > > > could have been done if he'd done it 100 percent > > > > > "the right way." >>>> > > > > > > > > Mount Everest is an unpredictable place. > > > > If George Mallory made his climb 100% 'the right way' in 1924, > > > > would he have successfully ascended and descended the mountain > > > alive? > > > > > > > > Mallory probably climbed the best he could, and intelligently, > > but > > > > for other climbers of Everest, wether one makes it or not, is > no > > > > excuse for doing stupid stuff on the way up....due to arrogance > > > > perhaps? > > > > > > Yow. Why is it so tough to get a straight answer > > > here? I'm not asking whether there's an excuse > > > for doing stupid stuff on the way up. I'm asking > > > whether TM really would have been able to save the > > > world if MMY hadn't screwed up. > > >>>> > > > > > > You are asking the questions of a child. > > Sorry you're finding them so difficult. >
Then answer this: 1. Are you assuming Maharishi screwed up? 2. If so, what rational did he have for doing so? 3. If he didn't screw up on any level, should we therefore worry about anything, or even care? Off-World ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
