Tell us more about that. How was Elizabeth Clare Prophet, and then Christianity 
"fastest and most complete"? In what sense?

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "hopintopin" <annwkingsley@...> wrote:
>
> Re: DrDumbAss Comment: "TM is not the static believerism you make it out to 
> be. You have NO IDEA about the techniques&#39; long term effects because you 
> quit doing it, decades ago." 
> 
> The long term effects of TM or any other technique for enlightenment are only 
> from the karma already released. There are no other long term effects other 
> than psychological conditioning. Karma is released while one is doing 
> whatever technique is employed, but ceases to be released when the technique 
> is stopped. I know all or part of seven different paths to enlightenment, but 
> practiced TM very regularly for over 17 years. I found the path that I 
> believe is the fastest and most complete, but it was an offshoot from first, 
> Elizabeth Clare Prophet's teachings, then Christianity.
>    
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> >
> > Michael, my memory is probably faulty about this, but didn't you recently 
> > say that you still do TM sometimes?  And btw, I'm glad you had such a good 
> > childhood, sounds like what many of us had, a mix of happy and unhappy 
> > stuff.  OTOH, 30 post in 24 hours?!  And most of it anti TM?!  
> > I think this is the kind of posting that makes me wonder if there's more 
> > going on for you than simply sharing your opinions.   
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> >  From: Michael Jackson <mjackson74@>
> > To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
> > Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 9:59 PM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Running through walls [was Re: Question for TM 
> > Cheerleaders]
> >  
> > 
> >   
> > that is the difference in you and me (thank God) you believe I quit, I know 
> > that I saved myself further brain numbing allegiance to a corrupt man and 
> > organization.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> >  From: "doctordumbass@" <doctordumbass@>
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2013 6:28 PM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Running through walls [was Re: Question for TM 
> > Cheerleaders]
> >  
> > 
> >   
> > Ha-Ha! Why, did you quit TM prematurely too?? My take on stuff I quit, is 
> > that I quit. I definitely don't continue to dig at it, if I am no longer 
> > participating. I would never start an argument with someone, arguing 
> > against something they did, when I didn't. How incredibly dense. So, yeah, 
> > I don't give quitters a lot of credence. 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808"  wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > You blew it - There is a phenomenon you've probably heard of in long 
> > > > distance running, called, "hitting the wall". It means reaching a point 
> > > > of physical depletion, after 15 or so miles, so that the only thing 
> > > > carrying you forward is your knowledge that it is a temporary phase, 
> > > > that can be transcended. But if you are not confident, this is the end 
> > > > of the journey. 
> > > > 
> > > > TM is all about continuing to run through imagined walls. Too bad you 
> > > > and Bee are quitters. Now, neither of you will ever know about the 
> > > > eternal benefits of TM. Maybe you should've hung in there a little 
> > > > longer? 
> > > 
> > > Hmm, you seem to have found yourself a perfect, if ridiculous, way
> > > to claim to have won any argument about TM:
> > > 
> > > "You only did it for 20 years! What do you know!"
> > > 
> > > Doesn't make much of an advertising slogan though: TM - twenty
> > > years of running through walls....
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > you are an idiot - I did TM for 20 years, twice a day, every day - it 
> > > > > took me that long to realize it wasn't the only game in town - stupid 
> > > > > me. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > >  From: "doctordumbass@" 
> > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2013 9:04 AM
> > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Question for TM Cheerleaders
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > >   
> > > > > The only people I see repeating what they were TOLD are you and MJ, 
> > > > > repeating over and over again, what you TELL yourselves. The thing 
> > > > > you haven't recognized about TM, *since you don't do it*, is that the 
> > > > > practice keeps you moving. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > TM is not the static believerism you make it out to be. You have NO 
> > > > > IDEA about the techniques' long term effects because you quit doing 
> > > > > it, decades ago. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > So you can fart into the wind all you like, exhorting us all about 
> > > > > what TM is and isn't. But you are nothing but a quitter sitting on 
> > > > > the sidelines bitching about it, in my humble opinion.
> > > > > 
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok  wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > My point is that a lot of these discussions are, from
> > > > > > > > > my point of view, falling prey to one of the most 
> > > > > > > > > chronic TM fallacies. People repeat stuff they were 
> > > > > > > > > TOLD -- by the people selling them the technique --
> > > > > > > > > as if it were not only true, but cosmically true,
> > > > > > > > > Gospel Truth. They consider these things Truth so 
> > > > > > > > > strongly that they *assume* them, parrot them along
> > > > > > > > > without even *noticing* the assumption, and then base
> > > > > > > > > other, subsequent statements on them as if the Truth
> > > > > > > > > of the assumptions was a given. 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Now that's something I noticed, that the theories and the 
> > > > > > > > mindset created continues way after a person actually 
> > > > > > > > leaves TM. If you were let's say 10 years in TM, your 
> > > > > > > > belief system will be influenced still decades after 
> > > > > > > > you left it - not all of the beliefs, but enough for you 
> > > > > > > > to still uncover it, if you are interested in it. 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > And if you are interested in challenging their supposed
> > > > > > > truth or value. In my experience, it's these "core" or
> > > > > > > *never challenged* beliefs that persist the longest, and
> > > > > > > are toughest to either recognize or challenge. Stuff like
> > > > > > > *assuming* that "effortless is better," or that "the only
> > > > > > > way to transcend is via effortlessness." People have been
> > > > > > > repeating that meme for so long -- in most cases *without
> > > > > > > ever trying a technique not based on effortlessness to 
> > > > > > > see if it's really true* -- that they no longer realize
> > > > > > > that it's a fundamental belief that underlies and shapes
> > > > > > > all other beliefs they have about meditation in general,
> > > > > > > and sometimes about life itself. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > A poignant example of this, related to me by at least
> > > > > > half a different spiritual teachers from traditions 
> > > > > > other than TM, has to do with what long-term TMers 
> > > > > > come to their public introductory talks. Often a tech-
> > > > > > nique of meditation is taught, and of course they sit
> > > > > > there and look as if they're trying it, just like 
> > > > > > everyone else in the audience. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > But all of these teachers have related the same story
> > > > > > to me. Some of these TMers actually come up to them
> > > > > > later and ask to meet with them privately, because
> > > > > > they're interested in attending more talks, or study-
> > > > > > ing with them, often because they liked the overall
> > > > > > energy of the group or of the teacher, or liked the
> > > > > > things he or she talked about. 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > What these teachers have learned to do, out of long
> > > > > > experience, is to ask the former TMers, "When we 
> > > > > > practiced the meditation I was teaching, did you 
> > > > > > actually *try* it, or did you sit there doing TM?
> > > > > > Be scrupulously honest now." 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > In *most* cases, when dealing with former TMers, they
> > > > > > admit that they never *did* try the new technique of
> > > > > > meditation. Some admit that some part of them still
> > > > > > felt "guilty" about trying it, as if doing so were
> > > > > > somehow "wrong" or "sinful," and others admitted to
> > > > > > not having tried it because "they already knew how
> > > > > > to meditate." 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Most of these teachers at this point asked the person
> > > > > > applying to study with them to go away, and return
> > > > > > when they had regained the ability to achieve 
> > > > > > "Beginner's Mind," and approach a new study with
> > > > > > humility, and not with arrogance. Few ever did.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > If you discover that Maharishi was playing games with 
> > > > > > > > beliefs, inventing stories to make people go along with 
> > > > > > > > it, and then see how long it takes to get rid of it, it 
> > > > > > > > makes you think. 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > And it's a real *challenge*, both to identify these core
> > > > > > > beliefs, to challenge them when you do, and then to drop
> > > > > > > them if you find them not true or not valuable for you. 
> > > > > > > This is more effort than most people who've invested for
> > > > > > > many years in a spiritual tradition are willing to expend.
> > > > > > > They pay "lip service" to having walked away, but *when*
> > > > > > > they walk away, they do so still carrying years of indoc-
> > > > > > > trination and beliefs as baggage. 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > But OTOH, if you REALLY transcend, if you really go ahead 
> > > > > > > > in your experience, it will also explode most of those 
> > > > > > > > beliefs. 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > For some. For others, they find a way *after* the trans-
> > > > > > > cendent experience to interpret it in hindsight as 
> > > > > > > reaffirming the things they believed before. 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > That is why those who really get into a higher state of 
> > > > > > > > consciousness, usually can't stay in the movement for 
> > > > > > > > very long. The beliefs and indoctrination is for those 
> > > > > > > > without experiences.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Can't argue with that. How you gonna keep 'em down on 
> > > > > > > the farm after they've seen Par-eee? Don't ever allow 
> > > > > > > them to see Par-eee.  :-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to