--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> wrote: > > "They are also waiting for a few more people to die off..." Â Excellent > strategy to avoid conflict. Â
Yes, Buck has used this term and this concept more than once here. Maybe it is just a natural inclination, you know, with all the exposure to the life and death cycles of farm animals. He just sees the rest of us, unless we meditate in the dome, as expendable - and the sooner we are on our way the better. > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Buck <dhamiltony2k5@...> > >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > >Sent: Monday, April 1, 2013 8:33 PM > >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Feedback to the TM Movement > > > > > >Â > >Nice post Wayback, > >JTowbridge, > >I did send the link to your FFL letter earlier this morning directly over to > >Dr. John Hagelin right after you posted it on FFL. He responded back to me > >immediately too before I went to the Dome. I'm just in from the day's farm > >work now. The work is going long in the fields with spring upon us now. I > >stopped earlier and meditated along in time with the large group tonite > >while I was on my tractor. Frankly the New TM Movement is incorporating > >more over-sight and process within its workings. It's dynamic and changing. > > Things started changing from back before and around when Maharishi died. > >There are different elements within it still including some strict > >preservationists who obstruct change but things are also progressive. I > >would say from talking with folks inside that some yet are essentially > >afraid to be more transparent in process because they fear someone like MJ > >coming along and being negative. But in a direction of more transparency is > coming. The strict preservationists have nothing to fear but fear itself. > I think your paper is a good common-sense advocacy for better management > practices that are actively being figured out more by committee process as J > Hagelin has been setting about engaging people in that kind of process. They > are also waiting for a few more people to die off as there is an active > preparing of a younger set going on to take over. These are very exciting > times within TM. It is in re-set. I agree, may the Unified Field save the > group meditation. > >-Buck > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote: > >> > >> I too really enjoyed your post, Mr Trowbridge. It was genuine and so > >> right on. Loved your points about conflict. In the name of being > >> "positive," so much has been overlooked, not dealt with, and repressed. > >> At every level. And for those whose very livelihood revolved around all > >> this for some years, it took a real toll. The frustration of trying to get > >> a "problem" dealt with was incredible - because the person was considered > >> to be unstressing or negative. A really unhealthy system evolved. Anyway, > >> you said it all so well and I thank you for that. > >> I suspect that in posting it here on FFL, it will be read by the people > >> you are talking to. My guess is that the big issue on the inside is > >> whether to try and mimic exactly how MMY ran the TMO or whether to modify > >> that so as to appeal to more people. Not modify the teaching, but the > >> organization, how it is run, the way rules are "enforced," how to handle > >> conflict. I think a lot will depend on how that unfolds now and in the > >> next decade as Bevan and John and the rajas begin to retire. Not that > >> the TMO needs to become a corporate place, but it is all so very fuzzy and > >> odd and seemingly going to end with our generation unless things change. > >> Too much garbage being dragged along to interest the younger generation. > >> But TM is pure gold for you? Lucky guy. > >> > >> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jwtrowbridge" <johnwtrowbridge@> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > Thank you, a beautiful response, and I will carry on. I go by my own > >> > experiences. This has always been my guide, and my experiences daily > >> > have been magnificent. The program is pure gold. Thanks, > >> > > >> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks John, beautiful post in it's positivity. And unique on this > >> > > > forum because you are one of perhaps only 5 posters here altogether > >> > > > that does TM regularily and have a non-agressive take on the TMO. So > >> > > > your idea of sending it here was perhaps a bit too enthusiastic, it > >> > > > will unfortunately only fuel more vile attacs on the TMO from the > >> > > > regulars here, most of whom have not done TM in decades. > >> > > > > >> > > > Aside from that it is impossible to disagree with you on any point, > >> > > > except for perhaps the most important; your idea that the > >> > > > > >> > > > "The goal of this organization is not to appeal to a particular > >> > > > leader or person, but to the widest possible audience who will > >> > > > appreciate and practice the TM program in its purity." > >> > > > and > >> > > > "....reach the widest possible audience who will appreciate and > >> > > > practice the TM program in its purity. This is the goal. This is > >> > > > what the TM organization is about." > >> > > > > >> > > > This is a widespread misunderstanding due largely to being stuck in > >> > > > Maharishi's old thinking or having been exposed only to this > >> > > > timeframe of Maharishi's philosophy on video, strategies that were > >> > > > perfect until about 1985. As the Age of Enlightenment grew and > >> > > > became an irreversible process the old thinking based on the > >> > > > individual was replaced with the concern for groups, and ultimately > >> > > > the whole world. Already in 1980, after having prevented the WWII > >> > > > during the winther of 1979, Maharishi said "From today no more > >> > > > meditators are necessary". Thus Maharishi's focus shifted and the > >> > > > TMO as we know it became in many ways obsolete, left unattended also > >> > > > by it's own Founder simply because it had no more function other > >> > > > than being the safekeeper of the purity of the teaching. No small > >> > > > task, but the real job of securing permanent world peace was given > >> > > > to the Rajas and the Vedic Pundits, a responsebility that remains > >> > > > theirs to this day. > >> > > > > >> > > > So my advice to you would be to "stay calm and carry on". Continue > >> > > > with your beautiful programme, knowing that some obstacles like bad > >> > > > smell or bad food or whatever will be thown into the mix at regular > >> > > > intervals, they don't matter much. Forget about the mismanagement of > >> > > > the TMO, it is irrelevant for you. Forget that the TMO must become > >> > > > in better shape to save the world, they won't and their task isn't. > >> > > > Let them do their bit as you do yours, life is too short to waste on > >> > > > such small things. > >> > > > One last thing; please see as many as possible of Maharishi's newest > >> > > > tapes that are available on youtube and are available here: > >> > > > >> > > http://www.youtube.com/user/maharishichannel > >> > > > >> > > Perhaps what I've stated above will be clearer. Thank you again for > >> > > your well-meaning post. > >> > > > Jai Guru Dev > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
