Hey Judy, I figured you'd play that angle. Acting as though I was referring to Share. But no that was not the case. As to the "psychological rape" accusation, why not solicit an opinion outside this little microcosm as to whether that might be an appropiate term. Then you might find some apologies might be in order, going in the other direction.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@> wrote: > > > > Oh my. I missed this earlier in the day. Barry, Barry, you > > were right. It's not about defending x,y, or z. It's really > > about a very demented, pinched, and unhappy person. My > > compassion reaches out to her. > > I don't think she's actually *demented*, Steve. That's a > little harsh. But if you want to help her get right with > her karma, see if you can persuade her to apologize for the "psychological > rapist" accusation. That'll be a big > step forward. > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks so much for your nurturing words feste. Big karmic burn > > > > happening. > > > > > > About time some of the rotten karma you've accumulated > > > here started burning you. Let's hope you learn something > > > from it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  All support appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > From: feste37 <feste37@> > > > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > > > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2013 3:24 PM > > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: parsing a la Descartes was HITLER'S > > > > VALENTINE > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >  > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <feste37@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > "Accuracy" is only part of it, Ann; the rest is interpretation. > > > > > > You can be technically "accurate" and still present a very > > > > > > biased view of something. In the case in point, it is not at > > > > > > all about "communicating," but rather about one person's desire > > > > > > to win and prove herself right. > > > > > > > > > > Actually, it's about one person's desire to expose the > > > > > malicious motivations and deceptive behavior of another > > > > > poster here as he tries to smear three other posters. > > > > > > > > > > > That's an attitude that works against real communication. > > > > > > If you look at any of this poster's responses to Share, > > > > > > for example, they are nothing to do with being "accurate." > > > > > > They are intended to browbeat and humiliate. > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, ain't it awful? After all, Share's posts are always > > > > > shining examples of "real communication" and never have > > > > > anything to do with winning and proving herself right. > > > > > > > > > > Right, feste? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Correct. I think Share does try her best to communicate. I think she > > > > has tried to communicate with you. She has actually been quite gentle > > > > and sometimes even playful with you, in spite of your persistent > > > > nastiness and confrontational attitude toward her. You could learn a > > > > lot from Share if you could free yourself from your obsessions. > > > > > > > > > >
