Well congratulations - it's official Curtis - you are genuinely, innocently, 
honestly retarded. LOL.

Your primary defensive, offensive mechanism is your self-righteous spin which 
constantly protects your self-interest. 

You will not hesitate to pummel, pulverize, petrify truth with your malicious, 
devious self-righteous spin in your relentless defense of your perceived image, 
your self-interest and your POV.

Bravo !!!


On Apr 29, 2013, at 10:37 AM, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltabl...@yahoo.com> 
wrote:

> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> 
> wrote:
> >
> > Curtis - Now that I'm done expressing myself on this topic why don't you 
> > reiterate your demand to Judy, raunchy and Ann to challenge me here.>
> 
> It wasn't a demand, it was an invitation. Predictably it was not taken.
> 
> < Unlike you and Barry I would love to be challenged and corrected, though I 
> may be running out of posts and have to get to it next week.>
> 
> Well I haven't noticed that about you Ravi, you seem to fly off the handle 
> pretty easily and start throwing the contents of your diaper. But you are in 
> a protected class with them so you have nothing to worry about. (Hey what 
> about those blacks, wink, wink.)
> 
> > 
> > Remember my other point which you ignore in your self-righteous spin - why 
> > are my posts not stand up routines and not fall under artists's freedom to 
> > be provocative and indulge in overt misogyny and racism if need be.>
> 
> Because you set it up carefully as being serious. Are you claiming now that 
> you were joking and doing schtick on Republican assholes who share the views 
> in your overgeneralized statement? 
> 
> Humor that makes fun of racists is really hard to do, it requires a context 
> to make sure the audience is in on the joke.
> 
> You didn't set it up that way.
> 
> Here is your "stand-up" routine as you presented it:
> 
> Dear Emily - I love black culture, black people for their heart-centeredness 
> - heck I loved 2Pac's dear mama, but since I don't suffer from any White 
> guilt and burden, nor I am I trying to spin it for a yuppie audience I will 
> say that most of the culture is very crude, misogynistic. Who doesn't love 
> their mom's - I am sorry - but is that enough and then you let your partner 
> fend for herself, forcing her to have multiple children for maximum food 
> stamps while your deadbeat ass languishes in jail. It's terribly hard to be a 
> black woman. Fine to be sexist, misogynistic as an artistic expression in 
> music, movie for entertainment but surely not a prescription for a modern, 
> liberal, sophisticated society.
> 
> So who else believes that Ravi was doing schtick on racist viewpoints, making 
> fun of THEM? Was the biggest laugh line supposed to be: "I will say that most 
> of the culture is very crude, misogynistic."
> 
> Let's see the honesty committee spin this one.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > On Apr 29, 2013, at 9:16 AM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote:
> > 
> > > And I don't care if you call me a racist, I myself mock at my inner 
> > > racist every day, laugh and mock my own mind's biases.
> > > 
> > > Conservatives wallow in their racism, liberal strive to rise above their 
> > > inner racism to meet others with compassion.
> > > 
> > > Scream loud as you want at others being racist - I'm just going to laugh 
> > > at your ignorant, sorry ass but when I meet you I will as always, despite 
> > > my contempt and disgust, rise above my judgement to meet you with love.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Apr 29, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Ravi Chivukula <chivukula.ravi@...> wrote:
> > > 
> > >> Curtis baby,
> > >> 
> > >> Let me get this straight again. I totally understand your ignorant, 
> > >> self-righteous white-ass's inability to wrap this.
> > >> 
> > >> I'm an equal opportunity racist - I have my biases, judgements on 
> > >> whites, Indians, Blacks, Hispanics, everyone including myself. I'm 
> > >> totally at peace with that, my senses constantly provide me data on 
> > >> every person - my mind filters through data, goes through set of my 
> > >> conditioning, my experiences and I have some readily available data at 
> > >> my disposal. This happens instantaneously Curtis baby and I understand 
> > >> its limitations.
> > >> 
> > >> Here's the kicker baby - here's where a person such as you would have 
> > >> trouble understanding, a person who I have utter contempt and disgust 
> > >> for, a person who shows an utter disregard for honesty and integrity, a 
> > >> person whose focus is his self-interest rather than serving the cause of 
> > >> truth, a person who is a victim of his entertainer, narcissistic 
> > >> self-interest, a person who cares for adoration rather than care for the 
> > >> truth.
> > >> 
> > >> It is that I can override my mind's biases, my conditioning, my likes 
> > >> and dislikes, my fears, insecurities, anxieties if any, to be terribly 
> > >> open, vulnerable, accepting and loving to anyone I meet. And your sorry 
> > >> self-righteous white ass can never match it, not for this life time 
> > >> anyway.
> > >> 
> > >> But an ignorant, idiot like you doesn't understand all the complexities, 
> > >> the sense of guilt, burden it creates, it's easy to cloak it with 
> > >> self-righteousness isn't it? Surprisingly Steve says he understands it - 
> > >> so you are a bigger idiot than I thought.
> > >> 
> > >> Get it Curtis baby?
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> On Apr 29, 2013, at 6:28 AM, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@...> 
> > >> wrote:
> > >> 
> > >>> 
> > >>> 
> > >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > 
> > >>> > 
> > >>> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> > >>> > <chivukula.ravi@> wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Damn you are not patient are you Curtis baby? You are sounding as 
> > >>> > > desperate
> > >>> > > and demanding attention as the bumbling retard Steve.
> > >>> > > 
> > >>> > > Let me get this right - I, Curtis will go any lengths to defend 
> > >>> > > artistic
> > >>> > > expressions of gang rape, objectification and/or derogatory 
> > >>> > > references to
> > >>> > > women but will spin Ravi as a racist because he points to a culture 
> > >>> > > of
> > >>> > > dead-beat dads burdening women with kids and leaving them at the 
> > >>> > > mercy of
> > >>> > > federal assistance?
> > >>> > > 
> > >>> > > Curtis baby - I'm at peace with my mind's judgement biases i.e my 
> > >>> > > inner
> > >>> > > racism, it doesn't prevent me from calling it as I see it nor 
> > >>> > > meeting
> > >>> > > people I judge with empathy. I don't cloak my burdens and guilt into
> > >>> > > self-righteousness while promoting an ol' boy, White Mid-Western 
> > >>> > > clique.
> > >>> > > 
> > >>> > > P.S This is a lot for your ignorant, burdened brain to fucking wrap 
> > >>> > > around
> > >>> > > - so don't bother.
> > >>> > > 
> > >>> > > Ok as promised, a sample response with due respect to your 
> > >>> > > disabilities -
> > >>> > > which earlier were only limited to your honesty and integrity - now
> > >>> > > seemingly extending to the intellectual realm as well.
> > >>> > > 
> > >>> > > -----------
> > >>> > > Hi Ravi - yes I re-read Raunchy's post again - here are the most
> > >>> > > objectionable part of the lyrics based upon your agreement of her 
> > >>> > > post.
> > >>> > > 
> > >>> > > "I'll tell you where I found her
> > >>> > > Lying down in the pines
> > >>> > > A gang of boys around her
> > >>> > > Some was higgin it
> > >>> > > Some was kissin it
> > >>> > > Some was huggin it
> > >>> > > Some was kneeling down
> > >>> > > There more rascal hangin round
> > >>> > > Try to tear my kingdom down"
> > >>> > > 
> > >>> > > I can see how this evokes strong images of gang-rape, the 
> > >>> > > objectification
> > >>> > > and derogatory references to women - in the form of gang of boys, 
> > >>> > > the usage
> > >>> > > of "it" to refer to his wife and "my kingdom" that shows his sense 
> > >>> > > of
> > >>> > > portraying his wife's sexual organs as his private property.
> > >>> > > 
> > >>> > > I think I got defensive because of my attachment to my role as an
> > >>> > > entertainer. I can now see that you are not questioning my right and
> > >>> > > creative expression as an artist and an entertainer.
> > >>> > > 
> > >>> > > The fact that my GF gave a positive interpretation perhaps shows the
> > >>> > > forgiveness, the acceptance of women. And perhaps, sensing my 
> > >>> > > initial
> > >>> > > unease - she was trying to make me feel better.
> > >>> > > 
> > >>> > > I can appreciate your perspective of the lyrics as gang-rape and as 
> > >>> > > being
> > >>> > > objectifying and degrading to women. I also know get a sense that 
> > >>> > > you are
> > >>> > > portraying the lyrics as being alien to modern culture and not 
> > >>> > > condemning
> > >>> > > my artistic expression.
> > >>> > > 
> > >>> > > Sorry I got off an tangent by calling you racist and I suppose you 
> > >>> > > are
> > >>> > > entitled your opinions and judgement and call it as you see fit. We 
> > >>> > > both
> > >>> > > here agree that artists have a freedom to be provocative.
> > >>> > > 
> > >>> > > Thank you - it was good a exchange and helps me understand where 
> > >>> > > you were
> > >>> > > coming from.
> > >>> > > 
> > >>> > 
> > >>> > Gee, Curtis, how'd you get to be so spin free? My washer's spin cycle 
> > >>> > had been getting an inferiority complex. Anyway, I'm glad Ravi's 
> > >>> > clear thinking has rubbed off on you. Sorry I flew off the handle 
> > >>> > projecting my biases against gang rape and misogyny onto the lyrics 
> > >>> > and misled Ravi into agreeing with me.>
> > >>> 
> > >>> My issue with you was you suggestion that my take on the meaning of the 
> > >>> song was somehow "self-serving" as if defending gang rape was my goal. 
> > >>> It was right out of the raunchy shitty trick playbook so it was not 
> > >>> unexpected, but I objected to it.
> > >>> 
> > >>> You were spinning my interpretation of the meaning of the song as a 
> > >>> statement about me as a person. Typical.
> > >>> 
> > >>> < Apparently, he has difficulty thinking for himself.>
> > >>> 
> > >>> Agreed. He is recycling phrases and words form a small group here for 
> > >>> their approval and it has worked. 
> > >>> 
> > >>> But hey it reminds me of how black people are (now that we are talking 
> > >>> straight with each other I don't have to water this down for the 
> > >>> liberals) You know how black men force their women to have more babies 
> > >>> so they can get food stamps which they somehow can use in prison? Well, 
> > >>> I think it is about time we talked straight about how black people 
> > >>> really are, don't you Raunchy?
> > >>> 
> > >>> (You are gunna find your future umbridge machine falling on some pretty 
> > >>> deaf ears after this.
> > >>> 
> > >>> > So no Ann, it is not hypocritical to make fun of religious ideas and 
> > >>> > still be against racist remarks. They are not the same. 
> > >>> > 
> > >>> > Ahhh, but the agenda behind, the motivation, the hatred, the 
> > >>> > ignorance and the anger can be. Absolutely. And THAT is what I'm 
> > >>> > talkin' about.
> > >>> 
> > >>> Geez, if only I had supported my allegations with a line by line 
> > >>> analysis of the lyrics as you required of Ravi, maybe he wouldn't have 
> > >>> gotten the brunt of your frustrations with me and your artistic 
> > >>> sensibilities would have remained unscathed. My bad. So, now that 
> > >>> everyone is friends again, it's all water under the bridge...isn't it? >
> > >>> 
> > >>> You weren't interested in the song and how the lyrics support different 
> > >>> interpretations. It was a tool for what you DO here.
> > >>> And with your interest in poetry and words I found it disappointing. 
> > >>> 
> > >>> 
> > >>> > 
> > >>> > > 
> > >>> > > 
> > >>> > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 3:44 PM, curtisdeltablues <
> > >>> > > curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > >>> > > 
> > >>> > > > **
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > That's what I thought, you have not text support for you idiotic
> > >>> > > > accusations about the song.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > More tourettes trolling.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Hey let's get Judy to defend your position on black people's food 
> > >>> > > > stamp
> > >>> > > > lov'n, baby making ways based on your ideas about creative 
> > >>> > > > evocative
> > >>> > > > expressions. I'd like to know how it magically takes the racist 
> > >>> > > > views RIGHT
> > >>> > > > off!
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Are you up for explaining Ravi's point Judy? He has already 
> > >>> > > > deferred to
> > >>> > > > Raunchy on the song so maybe you can be his spokesperson for this:
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > Ravi being his adorable self, the l'll scamp!
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > < I will say that most of the culture is very crude,
> > >>> > > > > misogynistic. Who doesn't love their mom's - I am sorry - but 
> > >>> > > > > is that
> > >>> > > > > enough and then you let your partner fend for herself, forcing 
> > >>> > > > > her to
> > >>> > > > have
> > >>> > > > > multiple children for maximum food stamps while your deadbeat 
> > >>> > > > > ass
> > >>> > > > > languishes in jail. It's terribly hard to be a black woman.>
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > I think it could use some of that much touted special brand of 
> > >>> > > > honesty you
> > >>> > > > talk so much about.
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > >
> > >>> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula 
> > >>> > > > <chivukula.ravi@>
> > >>> >

Reply via email to