--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... <no_reply@...> wrote: > > Hey Curtis, thanks for hanging in there - seriously. Beyond my basic > principle of each of us owning both our own shit, and our own gold, this > conversation has taken some really interesting turns. Very polarized, and > polarizing at times, but worth it. I like what I am learning about everyone, > including myself. > > And Em, and Share, your interaction has been awesome! I like it. Reality > speaks, and in so many voices here. I hope I sound neither voyeuristic or > preachy, I just enjoy the fuck out of an honest conversation. > > Judy, keeping that barge chugging up river, though nightfall's a comin', > while Ann plays harmonica, and R. Dog strums the banjo on deck. Spot on > compass heading, and easily overlooked. >
http://youtu.be/SleYHOcLjOg > I'll settle back now, into my rocking chair, and listen some more. Regards, > > Doctor Dumbass -- > [By appointment only. Specializing in hair re-growth on foot soles, and the > portion of the outer ear canal, known as Herpes Bathtub. Also treating > extensive cheese allergies.] > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > > > I don't suppose you ever saw the first Terminator movie Share, > > > > > > Third Terminator movie. But we're just talkin' here, no > > > need to be factual. > > > > > > > but this is what you are dealing with: > > > > > > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vCLeV7PfJs > > > > > > > > I object to being refereed to as a "Robin-hater" as if > > > > that term sums up the hours of interaction I had with > > > > the guy, or explains my more nuanced view of him now. > > > > > > "More nuanced view"--that gave me a belly laugh, Curtis, > > > thanks.> > > > > Right because you know my feelings better from what I have written here > > than I would know about myself, the Judy premise. > > > > I don't hate Robin, I found him very unpleasant when he got on his critical > > routine full time. Your constantly harshly negative take on my > > interactions with Robin show that you don't really give a shit about the > > guy beyond his usefulness for your little vendettas here. > > > > You paint a picture of our relationship as me duping his as a poor sap and > > then me making him a victim. This is not my view at all. > > > > You can't stop yourself from endlessly harping on Share's use of a phrase > > that would be long forgotten if not for your efforts to keep it alive. > > > > I know one other guy who is not fooled by your routine. I would bet on it. > > > > > > Sorta like using "non complimentary feeling" > > > to refer to Share's accusation of psychological rape. > > > Not to mention that oh-so-nuanced blue streak of > > > especially hateful falsehoods you unloaded concerning > > > those interactions after your most recent clash with > > > Robin.> > > > > > > Again, the Judy assumption that her view of my experience with Robin should > > supersede my actual experience of it. Judy knows what REALLY happened > > between Robin and me even though both of us have struggled with really > > figuring out why things went South. > > > > And surprise, in Judy's jaundiced view, it was all MY fault and poor Robin > > was just a victim. > > > > > > > > > But it is worthy of note that the people who did find > > > > some resonance with Share's term did share the > > > > experience of being at the business end of Robin's "I > > > > WILL improve you whether you like it or not" shotgun. > > > > > > Notice that Curtis does not add "more than a quarter of a > > > century ago" (for all but Curtis).> > > > > And the time factor would matter how if he is running the same game now, > > which led to the agreement? > > > > Notice also the subtle > > > use of "shotgun" as a metaphor to convey violent coercion > > > (he strongly objected to Robin using metaphors of physical > > > conflict in their discussions, BTW). Curtis doesn't miss > > > a trick. And the characterization in quotes is made as if > > > it were definitive and invulnerable to challenge (it's > > > neither, but that's another can of worms).> > > > > > > > I am cutting out everything else from this post and would > > > > like to remind the people trying to "help" Robin's online > > > > image, it is repetition that floods the search engines. > > > > What you have accomplished by this massive foot print link > > > > of his name and this term is to make it impossible for > > > > anyone to get to the bottom of this discussion, even if > > > > miraculously Share rolled over and said whatever it is that > > > > she is supposed to say to satisfy you. (My suspicion is > > > > that no such words exist.) > > > > > > "I retract my accusation that Robin psychologically > > > raped me" are the words from Share that would satisfy > > > *me*.> > > > > And she hasn't felt a desire to retract them. So you have been badgering > > her nonstop for months to try to "get" her to do so beyond all reason and > > beyond what is consistent with your stated goal of helping Robin's online > > rep. Why should she retract something because YOU don't like it? Robin > > ended up using it himself later so it must not bug him as much as you. > > > > > > > > But the really fun part here is that of the various > > > links to Robin's name in the context of the term > > > "psychological rape," the great majority will be to > > > vigorous objections to the accusation, many of them > > > backed up by documentation calling it in serious > > > question. > > > > By nutbags like YOU. You are not helping. Look how many times you have > > repeated it in THIS post. You can't resist repeating the term when I have > > carefully avoided it here. With friends like you Robin doesn't need > > enemies. > > > > > > > > Whether anyone "gets to the bottom of this discussion" > > > is immaterial. What's important is that they see that > > > the accusation sparked significant outrage and pushback; > > > it didn't just sit there like a little stinkbomb > > > unchallenged.> > > > > But you keep bringing it up dopey. Don't you get what you are doing? > > > > > > > > > So keep it up if you must, but know that I am officially > > > > blowing the lid off the cover > > > > > > AHA HAHA HAHAHA!! Curtis at his most pompous. > > > > > > > that this is all in the best interest of Robin's online > > > > image. You are doing it for your own personal reasons, > > > > > > You see, Curtis knows our thought process better than we > > > do ourselves.> > > > > No this is not the case. I don't need to know your motives I see the > > result. I am not guessing what your motives are,but I know for an objective > > fact that you are flooding the search engines with your repetition, so your > > claim that you are helping his image online IS bullshit. So the only other > > option is that you are a moron and don't realize what you are doing (but > > now you do) or you have some other reason that is personal. You haven't > > revealed what your thought process is beyond the bogus one that I am > > dispelling here. > > > > > > > > Bullshit, Curtis. That's another of the vicious little > > > tropes you haul out when you don't have a case. You've > > > used it quite a bit, and it's no truer now than when you > > > first manufactured it. > > > > I beg to differ and so does GOOGLE. > > > > > > > > It is, of course, a projection: Curtis has been siding > > > with Share not because he cares about her but because > > > she's useful to him in his jihad against Robin.> > > > > This is an ignorant malicious statement. Jihad? WTF/ > > > > > > > > (Or maybe he's just jealous that Robin has such strong, > > > articulate supporters, while he has to make do with Barry > > > and Steve and Xeno and Share.) > > > > My point is that his supporters are acting like idiots in this case, > > working against his best interest online by prolonging this ridiculous > > JIHAD against Share. (thanks for that, it came in handy pretty quickly.) > > > > > > > despite the fact that your fixation is hurting his online > > > > image. > > > > > > No, it ain't, Curtis, sorry. I just blew the lid off that > > > piece of disingenuous crap too. > > > > OK then carry on "helping" the poor schmuck. > > > > > > > > For Curtis, of course, the objections to Share's accusation > > > are NOT A GOOD THING. He would much rather the accusation > > > stand on its own without anybody contesting it, because he > > > figures it gives his own attacks on Robin some credibility.> > > > > Right my criticisms of Robin are contingent on Share, thank God she showed > > up. And the "contesting it" ship sailed about 7 months ago Judy. There > > has been plenty of contesting going on. I am just pointing out that your > > stated goal and what is happening are not aligned. I find it hilarious > > that you are going to continue to cut Robin's nose off to spite HIS face > > because i have mentioned this. It almost compels you to continue on this > > idiotic path. > > > > > > > > And the very *last* thing he wants is for Share to retract > > > the accusation. He doesn't want the work he did to turn > > > her against Robin to go to waste.> > > > > Here you are being delusional. I did nothing of the sort and had very > > little interactions with their conversations. Especially compared to you. > > Did you turn Robin against Share? No they created their relationship > > between them all on their own. Blaming me for this is part of your > > imagined conspiracy idiocy. > > > > > > That's why he's trying so hard to discourage those of us > > > who are calling Share on her slander.> > > > > Hey, I said what I wanted. Carry on. Google loves you. Keep it up > > forever. Robin's online image was created by Robin, not by Share. But now > > his writing here is being swamped by the impression that you are giving. > > That the issue of PS is a BIIIIIIG one, and might be an important > > consideration for anyone evaluating his credibility. > > > > But if he is happy with what you are creating online for him, it really is > > none of my business, so I'll bow out and watch your busy, busy work unfold. > > It is hilarious. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
