Oh, boy, salyavin, you said the magic words.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson <mjackson74@...> wrote: > > Wait a minute, you know a lot of TM'ers who are on anti-depressants? Are you > joking? Wonder why that piece of info doesn't get into the benefits-of-TM > so-called scientific studies? > > > > > ________________________________ > From: salyavin808 <fintlewoodlewix@...> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 2:27 PM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: SELF-HYPNOTIZE: Channel, End Negativity, Feel > Good, Achieve Goals Dr. Shelley S > > > > Â > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > MMY did not recommend the use of hypnosis since, IMO, it promotes self-will > > and not the will of the unified field. > > The unified field has a will? Far out. > > I doubt hypnosis does anything to you that experience doesn't. > Basically we get to be how we are by what happens to us. Hypnosis > just replaces negative programming we can get from life with > something more positive of our choice rather than the unwitting > engrams from the school of hard knocks. > > NLP and psychotherapy do the same thing, introduce a new idea > and repeat it and it will stick after a while and become your > new default response to whatever it was that's bothering you. > > This is of course at odds with TM teaching that all problems are caused by > "stress" and that all stress can be released through TM. > The biggest problem with relying on TM as a therapy is that you > don't get to choose which bit is released next and instead hope > that the system somehow settles itself down enough for you to feel > acceptably transformed. > > This inefficiency of TM probably goes a long way to explaining why > so many TMers I meet take anti-depressants or see therapists etc. > There are too many still seeking peace in the TMO for it to be > considered a good therapeutic technique. That'd make a good study > for MUM? >
