--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > MMY did not recommend the use of hypnosis since, IMO, it > > > > > > promotes self-will and not the will of the unified field. > > > > > > > > > > The unified field has a will? Far out. > > > > > > > > Isn't it just a *trip* that so many people assume > > > > it does? > > > > > > Actually it gives me the creeps! > > > > > > I mean the UF - if it exists - is simply what the universe > > > is before it gets all random and foamy and *long* before > > > the chaos becomes visible as the whirly subatomic stuff we > > > all know and love. > > > > > > Ascribing intentions to it is absurd but worshipping > > > it is deeply weird. > > > > FWIW, I've never run across either idea in the TM > > context. > > Then you weren't paying attention. It's the foundation of > everything in SCI. It is organising the universe in perfect > order and without a problem. It is Natural Law itself and it > is consciousness and therefore it is us and apparently we can > influence it.
Yes, I know all that, thanks. > As for worshipping it, have a word with Buck. Buck is not exactly my chosen authority on MMY's teaching. > All TM concepts > about the UF are religious ideas transposed into modern > scientific terms as though they are the same thing and they > are not. BIG discussion, not anywhere near that simple. > Someone rang the NLP office once and asked what natural law > actually was and I didn't know, which was a bit crap, so I > decided to find out: Natural Law is god's will, the unified > field is the field of all possibilities governed by natural > law. Probably be a good idea to read (or reread) the section in SBAL on Impersonal and Personal God... > You can't tell the public that though so we have all sorts > of diversionary ways of saying it like "the best way to do > things" or "what your body wants you to do but your mind > sometimes gets wrong" Never heard those in the TM context either! that sort of anodyne crap that diverts > from the real message that we knew everything and could > transform the world if only people would listen and hop along. > > > > > I always used to wonder what the unified > > > field charts were trying to say, it was clear that they > > > had an intention beyond simply informing the observer > > > what the TMO thought was going on. > > > > Um, I don't think the charts had anything to do with > > the Unified Field having intentions or with worshipping > > it. > > >
