--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "salyavin808" <fintlewoodlewix@...> wrote:
(snip)
> Yep, a functioning brain is the seat of consciousness but
> groups like the TMO will attempt to weaken that idea for
> their own agenda.

Salyavin, why don't you see if you can make your case
without leaving a trail of slain straw men?

Just to reiterate: Chalmers and Nagel and a number of
other non-TM, nonmystical, nonreligious philosophers
and scientists of excellent repute take the view that
consciousness is not adequately explained by biology
(and without invoking quantum mechanics or the
paranormal, either).

(snip)
> Because I don't believe the mystic mythos it just seems
> staggeringly obvious to me that it's all in the brain and
> totally dependent on it.

What if you didn't have the "mystic mythos" to beat up on,
would it be any less staggeringly obvious to you? Could
you then take a good look at the "hard problem" and apply
reductive principles to make the most basic fact of human
experience--what it is like to be oneself--go away?


Reply via email to