[FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to their "need to argue?"

[Ann]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@...> wrote:
>
> Ann's turn to PLONK. Simply amazing!
> 
> from google dictionary
> 
> de·bate  
> /diˈbāt/
> Noun
> A formal discussion on a particular topic in a public meeting or 
> legislative assembly, in which opposing arguments are put forward.  
>  
> Verb
> Argue about (a subject), esp. in a formal manner.  
>  
> Synonyms
> noun.   discussion - dispute - argument - disputation 
> verb.   dispute - discuss - argue - deliberate - canvass  

Plonk all you want, it won't help you or whatever cause you think you believe 
in. 
You know that what you mention by "argue" is not the same thing as putting 
forward "opposing arguments". You also know very well that Barry meant the 
pejorative form of arguing as in endless bickering and mean-spirited back 
stabbing. You have twisted what Emily said. Now why would you do that?
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
>  From: Ann <awoelflebater@...>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 5:03 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to their "need 
> to argue?"
>  
> 
> 
>   
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
> >
> > turq wrote: have a corollary need to portray anyone who *won't* argue with 
> > them as "broken" or "defective" or "bad" in some way.
> > Judy commented: Nobody has said anything like that for days.
> > Emily to Xeno about Share: worse than that, not being willing to even 
> > engage in conversation or debate or play on what she does, FFL style or 
> > anything. 
> > 
> > Share replies: PLONK
> 
> This is perhaps one of the most unbelievable responses I have ever witnessed 
> at FFL. "engage in conversation", "debate" or "play" arenot arguing Share. My 
> God, simply amazing.
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> >  From: authfriend <authfriend@>
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2013 2:55 PM
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Does the size of one's ego equate to their 
> > "need to argue?"
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote:
> > (snip)
> > > Yet on this forum (judging from the posts I skip these days but can grok
> > > the essence of just from their first words in Message View), some people
> > > not *only* seem to have a constant need to argue, they *also* seem to
> > > have a corollary need to portray anyone who *won't* argue with them as
> > > "broken" or "defective" or "bad" in some way.
> > 
> > No, you're hallucinating again. Nobody has said anything
> > like that for days.
> > 
> > But you've said what you say here I don't know how many
> > times. Dozens.
> >
>