Vituperation toward Rory is highly debatable. But peace and equanimity is elusive and illusory. I suppose Krishna standing at the battlefield should have gone - "to hell with this, this is too much of conflict, stress, pain and suffering I should just retain and strive for peace and equanimity, surely a worthy endeavor than truth? !!!"
Such a fascination for peace and equanimity. Liberals are fascinated with the phony and inauthentic Dalai Lama because they think he is an embodiment of peace and equanimity. Nobody cares for truth - and truth involves lot of pain, discomfort, stress, suffering, causes, triggers lot of anxieties, discomfort, fear trying to reconcile the contradictions, the complexities and the divergent, discordant tones of reality. You think I had a blast going after Rory - that I didn't have to face any discomfort as I contemplated going after Rory? Why did I not choose peace and equanimity. This pretense of peace and equanimity and this intricate philosophy of wavicles and particles is just a sham. Your post is a perfect illustration, again, of what I'm trying to say. If Rory or you think that Rory is the embodiment of peace and equanimity then you are being delusional, benign and harmless delusion I have to reiterate. Clearly you and Rory are nice people. I haven't seen but nice, beautiful people around Amma all caught in benign, harmless delusions. Sorry I have no desire for such sham of a peace and equanimity. On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Alex Stanley <j_alexander_stan...@yahoo.com > wrote: > ** > > > No, I was just riffing off what Curtis had said. Sure, Rory's language can > be a bit "out there", but the guy's got an enviable degree of inner peace > and equanimity, and it's very strange to see him, of all people, attract > such vituperation. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> > wrote: > > > > Ah ha ha. Â That was *you* Alex, that said that, no? Â You'd better make > sure you get over to Rory's palace at the earliest next opportunity to > soothe the rough edges out - perhaps bring him a hangover concoction/remedy > from that kitchen of yours - hopefully nothing that separates on the way > over. Â > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Alex Stanley <j_alexander_stanley@...> > > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > > Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 4:49 PM > > > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: FFL looks different this morning > > > > > > > > Â > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" <rorygoff@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > I know what he's saying too. It comes across to me as > > > > egotistical. And phony as a three-dollar bill. (I'm > > > > sure *he* thinks it's true, but that's the egotism, > > > > IMHO.) > > > > > > OK, phony too, Judy! Thanks. You are very generous with the > > > offerings today. Now it appears you may somewhat agree with > > > Curtis, who saw me as a Neurolinguistic-programming, form-running > > > charlatan. This is indeed a day to remember. > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/324398 > > > > >
