--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Seraphita" <s3raphita@...> wrote: > > Fergie! Don't get me started! When you think of the virtually unlimited > choice a true-blue royal has over a life partner they sure do pick 'em. > About Diana, there's also the ticklish aspect that she was sleeping with > Arabs and Indians. We are talking about the succession to the Throne > here and there were rumours she was pregnant when she died. One has to > wonder if there was an unpleasant racist element to the irritation she > sparked in the Establishment of the day.
Oh no, we can't have anyone pollute the succession to the throne with vile foreign genes. Much better to have another inbred chinless wonder sucking off the civil teat for it's entire life. Talking of bringing the "royal" family into disrepute, how do you feel about princes Charles and Andy meeting with ministers to make sure they don't introduce laws that might interfere with their private business interests, that they don't pay tax on? Sack the fucking lot of them, I'm amazed that this country is so backwards we still need a "royal" family to pour money over just so the lame can get all dewy eyed about "real" princesses. The D&D of Cambridge have just moved into their first home of many, a 10 bed Georgian mansion (not including staff quarters obviously) in return he'll smile like his Mum used to and she might open the occasional supermarket. Nice work if you can get it. Vive le revolution! > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" wrote: > > > > > > > > It's dirty work but someone has to do it. Diana was snorting coke, > > > sleeping around with whoever took her fancy and generally bringing > the > > > Royal Family into disrepute. > > > > If they killed Diana for that then should have hung, drawn and > quartered Fergie (the Duchess of York). I don't buy it. Diana wasn't > important enough to kill. Look at the behaviour of the English monarchy > over the last 900 years and she was the least of their problems. > > > > >
