--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > You are on record here as admitting that the TM movement > > > > rips people off, and NOT CARING. You are on record here > > > > as having absolutely no problem with them never following > > > > through on any of their promises and grand schemes. It > > > > doesn't seem to bother you if the movement's leaders > > > > indulge in behavior that would be considered inappropriate, > > > > if not illegal, in ANY organization. You don't seem to > > > > have any problem with this stuff at all. > > > > > > Could you cite some of Lawson's posts here that > > > indicate all or any of the above? > > > > > > Because my impression is very different. It seems > > > to me that what Lawson does is question knee-jerk > > > criticism of the TMO and MMY (at the same time that > > > he has plenty of criticisms of his own). > > > > I'm not sure what you, Judy, are referring to when you mention > > Lawson's questioning the knee-jerk reactions of others. Much of the > > conversation that has been going on at least regarding Hagelin's and > > Bevan's licentious behavior is information that has been verified > > first-hand. > > I was referring to Lawson's posts generally (as > was Barry's attack). But as far as the "licentiousness" > issue is concerned, Lawson first asked what > licentiousness was being referred to, and then why > anybody cared. He wasn't suggesting the behavior > hadn't occurred. > > <snip> > > These are leaders of the movement who have no problem arrogantly > > chiding others for their lack in "living life in accord with Natural > > Law." This duplicitous life is being lived by the very people who we > > have placed our trust and faith in. > > Yup, and Lawson said it sounded hypocritical to > him. He just doesn't seem to be as hung up about > it as some others.
I tend to agree. Like I always say: whether MMY is diddling some gorgeous babe or the Katzenjammer Kids are (i.e. Bevan and John), it doesn't affect one iota whether TM works. And if True Believers want to devote their lives -- at less than minimum wage -- to working for those creeps, well, then, that's their business -- and karma! -- for beleiving in and working for "the very people who we have placed our trust and faith in". Cause guess what? Faith shouldn't have ANYTHING to do with it in the first place...so the joke's on them for trying to make TM a religion in the first place! Ha Ha! ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
