Dit-dit- dit-dittos!

 

________________________________
 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" <authfri...@yahoo.com>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 12:08 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: RE: The latest shooter liked to meditate
  
   
 
There has been a great deal of twisting by TMers of Christian Scripture 
(including by Maharishi) to make it appear to be consonant with the TM 
teaching. I'm strongly against that. The TM teaching ought to be able to stand 
on its own.

There are plenty of naive TMers who buy into it, and I think it's important to 
be scrupulous about our use of Scripture so as not to mislead them. As I told 
Buck, he could easily have cited what he wrote as a free paraphrase or "loose 
interpretation" of Matthew 18:20 according to TM, and let everyone decide on 
their own whether that made sense, rather than citing it as Matthew 18:20..

In mainstream Christianity, Jesus is not "Christ Consciousness" or "the One 
Self" or the "Unified Field." Granted at this point he wouldn't be embodied, 
but he is understood as a divine personal being to whom one can relate 
directly, not just a type of higher consciousness.

I also think to equate "There am I in the midst of them" with "The Unified 
Field will be found multiplied in effect" is a huge stretch, especially since 
the Unified Field is impersonal, whereas Jesus is personal.

If you make it abstract enough, you can equate just about anything with 
anything else, no matter how far apart the concrete versions are. At a certain 
point, that sort of attempt becomes underhanded and deliberately misleading. 
And it shows a lack of respect for the original.

 
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
Buck is being playful. Does anyone really imagine that the following quote 
could be lifted from the New Testament? “Where two or three are gathered in 
effective transcending meditation there the Unified Field will be found 
multiplied in effect”.

And, as happens, as an interpretation of what the New Testament writer was 
getting at, Buck's is an arguable (loose) interpretation. "For where two or 
three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them."  
Matthew 18:20

 "in effective transcending meditation"=  "together in my name". . . What are 
the Christians doing together in his name if not praying, ie, meditating? 
Matthew isn't talking about singing third-rate hymns.

 "the Unified Field will be found multiplied in effect"= "am I in the midst of 
them". . . The "I" here does not refer to Jesus, a particular first-century 
rabbi, but to Christ Consciousness, ie, the One Self, ie, the Unified Field.


Perhaps Buck should do a complete translation of the Bible . . .  

PS: re"really needs to come to FF and see what a real bliss ninny is like!": if 
we could go back in a time machine to AD 50 it would be funny if all the early 
Christians we met were in bliss ninny mode. 



>--- In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote:
>
>
>Exactly Jason! Buck was simply being playful. It's clear to me he wasn't lying 
>because it was not his intention to deceive. Nor was he blaspheming as Xeno 
>suggested. Maybe Xeno was being playful too? Anyway, Buck wasn't even being a 
>bliss ninny. If anybody thinks somebody on FFL is a bliss ninny, that anybody 
>really needs to come to FF and see what a real bliss ninny is like! I stand 
>with Buck and Col Leed. Sgt. Share
>
>
>
>     
         

Reply via email to