Well noozguru, most of my working life was spent in university settings so in
that sense I have not spent much time in the corporate world. I also understand
what you're saying from a jyotish perspective: ketu in the first, Libra lagna.
Plus my sister and I have noticed that our Dad censors himself less as he gets
older. Maybe I'm taking after him in that regard. As for TM and reserve, I
think TM frees the personality. There can be awkward and or rough phases as
that unfolds. What do you think?
________________________________
From: Bhairitu <noozg...@sbcglobal.net>
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC
Basically you are showing a lack of "reserve" which is what the corporate world
would call it. Your posts tend to be impulsive. We been critical in the past
of this kind of OCD posting. If anything TM should produce a quality of
"reserve" for people. Apparenlty for some it doesn't and I think I know why.
On 09/30/2013 01:46 PM, Share Long wrote:
>turq, basically you're saying that you don't enjoy my posts and therefore I
>should stop posting so much! It's lunacy! If I were standing there with a gun
>to your head, yes, you'd have a point. Otherwise I don't see how you are being
>subjected to, forced, dominated by anyone to do wading or anything else with
>regards to the FFL posts. I just don't get it. Also I don't know who the 5th
>person is!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 2:58 PM
>Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Post Count Sat 28-Sep-13 00:15:03 UTC
>
>
>
>
>Followup. Since I made this post, the same 5 people
>whom I characterized as having nothing
interesting
>to say and as being so out of control that
they
>flood the forum with their garbage have
followed up
>on my *single* post with a total of
*fifteen* posts.
>
>In not one of them did any of them offer to
cut down
>on their inane post-flooding. In fact, they
attempted
>to "shoot the messenger" and avoid any
responsibility
>for their own actions. I'd say that they
made my point
>about trying to "dominate" the forum for me.
>
>The bottom line on this is clear -- these
five posters
>"contributed" only slightly less that HALF
THE TOTAL
>POSTS MADE LAST WEEK. And they'll do it
again this
>week, and the next, and the week after that.
And they
>don't think there's a problem with that, or
with forcing
>other people to wade through their crap.
>
>I'm simply making the point that the
phenomenon of
>"people leaving FFL" is **NOT** due to Neo,
but to a
>few people who simply cannot control their
motormouths,
>and who feel they have the "right" to
subject other
>people to post after post after post after
post after
>post...whatever they want to post, whenever
they want
>to post it.
>
>I'll stop talking about this now, because
unlike them
>*I* can control myself.
>
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote:
>>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long <sharelong60@> wrote:
>> >
>> > And lastly, as long as one is free
to scroll past
>> > potentially offensive posts, how
can domination
>> > occur in any significant way?
>>
>> Turq's Monday Morning Free Clue To The
Clueless
>>
>> You think "free to." Others here think
"have to."
>>
>> It's a matter of signal-to-noise
ratios. Taking last
>> Friday's Post Count as an example,
there are more
>> than a few on the forum who would
categorize 421
>> of the total 852 posts (49.4%) as
noise.
>>
>> That is, long experience has taught
these people
>> that there is nothing to be gained from
reading
>> any of these posts. Fortunately, as you
say, we are
>> "free to" disregard them by scrolling
past them.
>>
>> But this means that in any given week
we "have to"
>> scroll past easily half of all posts on
the forum.
>> There comes a time when the desire for
the occasional
>> gem of intelligence (signal) simply
isn't worth it
>> any more because of the sheer bulk of
the other posts
>> (noise).
>>
>> Especially because the noise-posters
don't seem to
>> be able (or willing) to control
themselves. When
>> it's not invective and trolling, it's
inanity such
>> as was described so well by s3raphita
earlier:
>>
>> > And bear in mind that a lot of the
messages are
>> > simple thumbs up or thumbs down
feedback, such as . . .
>> > "Outstanding post!"
>> > "Ha-ha!"
>> > "Thanks for that link"
>> > "Did you forget to take your
medics today?"
>> > "You sir are a complete prat"
>> > "YAWN . . . "
>>
>> Bottom line is that you're going to
start seeing a
>> LOT of people bailing from FFL.
>>
>> And it WON'T be because of Neo.
>>
>> That, dear lady, is domination.
>>
>
>
>
>
