Buck, I'm objecting to the word ALL because I've known rich people who do care 
and poor people who don't. And yes, I've read this article and recognize that 
there are the tendencies.




On Friday, October 11, 2013 11:07 AM, "dhamiltony...@yahoo.com" 
<dhamiltony...@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
  
 Jeez, did you read the
article?  The science shows rich people to enclave and thereby they
tend to lack empathy for other groups while others live and work in
community and consequently tend to live with more empathy towards
others.  That simply is the elements of the TM movement community
also.  It just is.  The TM-Rajas were told as part of their deal
specifically to not mix with the rest of us.  A very few have come to
meditate in the Dome.  But most do not. To themselves they aren't
part of it really.  Evidently there is a scientific problem there
with themselves and it reflects in how they continue to price TM and
the vigor of the larger TM meditation movement.
-Buck


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


yes, but I was talking about my own experience rather than research. Also Mark 
Twain comes to mind: all generalizations are false, including this one.





On Friday, October 11, 2013 10:48 AM, "s3raphita@..." <s3raphita@...> wrote:
 
  
Re "It's not my experience that ALL rich people care less, nor that all poor 
people care more.":
Yes, there's evidence showing that poor people are actually more generous with 
their money (proportionately) than the wealthy. In fact, one of the degrading 
aspects of poverty isn't so much that you don't have enough for yourself but 
that you can't help or, for that matter, entertain others.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


Buck, it's not my experience that ALL rich people care less, nor that all poor 
people care more. I think such generalizations cause more polarizing which is 
not IMO what is needed!




On Friday, October 11, 2013 8:47 AM, "dhamiltony2k5@..." <dhamiltony2k5@...> 
wrote:
 
  
 You know, Maharishi was
very able to adapt course to circumstances as he went along.  It is
certainly time for the TM-Rajas to adapt course so the movement can
teach once again.  I am reminded of the time that Maharishi was in
Fairfield as the Domes were being built.  One morning he came in to
the group meditation over at the campus field house and sat with it. 
He got to talking with the group there.  Someone asked about the Age
of Enlightenment technique and Maharishi asked if everyone did not
have it?  On seeing hands go up for those who did not he then said
everyone should have it.  That day arrangements were made for people
then to get it.   That was done, no money charged for an $850
technique.  Bevan taught it to people then for free.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


And who made that decision to "create" the Rajas? Your much vaunted Marshy - 
says a lot don't it?





On Friday, October 11, 2013 12:15 AM, "dhamiltony2k5@..." <dhamiltony2k5@...> 
wrote:
 
  
“Rich
people just care less,”
Well
then, pretty obviously the TM-Rajas being pre-select for wealth are
too remote to understand the problem.


Since
the 1970s, the gap between the rich and everyone else has
skyrocketed. Income inequality is at its highest level in a century.
This widening gulf between the haves and have-less troubles me, but
not for the obvious reasons. Apart from the financial inequities, I
fear the expansion of an entirely different gap, caused by the
inability to see oneself in a less advantaged person’s shoes.
Reducing the economic gap may be impossible without also addressing
the gap in empathy.


This
has profound implications for societal behavior and government
policy. Tuning in to the needs and feelings of another person is a
prerequisite to empathy, which in turn can lead to understanding,
concern and, if the circumstances are right, compassionate action.  


“Turning
a blind eye. Giving someone the cold shoulder. Looking down on
people. Seeing right through them.
These
metaphors for condescending or dismissive behavior are more than just
descriptive. They suggest, to a surprisingly accurate extent, the
social distance between those with greater power and those with
less” 


http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/10/05/rich-people-just-care-less/?exprod=myyahoo&_r=1
  






Reply via email to