---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 More meat on the bone? Get a grip, Anne, he said he was already doing puja to 
a 'Shiva Lingam'. Whatever; it doesn't seem to be improving his disposition 
very much. Go figure.
 

 First of all my name is ANN. Secondly, I like your wordplay on the whole 
lingam/bone(er) thing. The addition of the term "get a grip" finishes off the 
double entendre nicely. 
 
 On 10/31/2013 10:48 PM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
 
    
 
 
 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
<emptybill@...> mailto:emptybill@... wrote:
 
 What a fucking idiot you are. 
 
 
 When my teacher came to my house he talked around and had kind and sage advice 
for my daughter, She like him very much. He then 
 
 wanted to look around so I gave him the tour. When he got 
 
 to my sadhana room and looked at the large altar (set down
 low - Hindu style) and he saw the traditionally carved Shiva Lingam 
 
 surrounded by small rudraksha-a and covered with flower blossoms.
 Surmounting it were large hand-painted Thankas of various Vajrayana Yidam and 
Dharma protectors ... like Ekajâti and Rahula. 
 
 
 
 He pointed at the Lingam and said "Oh - Original Tantra!" That was 2005. He 
asked questions about it and about what practice I did. I told him I didn't do 
a daily abhisheka but rather did it "as desired ... kamya"
 ever since my wife died. I queried him further and he confirmed ... 
 
 "Yeah - not Buddhist but still good Tantra." He even considers Sankhya to be 
very close in its conclusions and metaphysics to Dzogchen. 
 
 
 
 All this just show how shallow your ideas are ... fool.
 
 What else to expect from a mere book reading Troll. 
 
 
 "ideas" might be the operative word here. I don't have the time or the 
disposition for living and practicing ideas. I am far too busy living life. Try 
it, you might find it has lots more meat on the bone.
 
 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
<punditster@...> mailto:punditster@... wrote:
 
 emptybill:
 > I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam.
 >
 So, you're performing a daily Hindu sacrifice to the Rudra lingham, at the 
same time you're trying to practice under a Tibetan Buddhist Rinpoche? Where is 
Vaj when we need him?
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancharatra 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancharatra
 
 > Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated by Sanjukta 
 > Gupta. 
 And, why would I want to read a book to learn about the Laksmi Tantra? I'm not 
even interested in Hindu Tantrism - my interest is Tibetan Tantra. Can you 
speak any Tibetan?
 
 http://www.amazon.com/Laksmi-Tantra-Pancaratra-Sanjukta-Gupta
 
 On 10/30/2013 8:15 PM, emptybill@... mailto:emptybill@... wrote:
 
   Here Here. There There. 
 Finally an accurate summary of the pompous Troll. 
 
 Hey Troll! Me too ...
 I do the Pâñcharâtra Mahâ-Rudrâbhishekam.
 It's Tantric ... asshole.
 
 It's such bullshit what you say ... Lakshmi this - Lakshmi that.
 Why don't you read something useful. Laksmi Tantra translated by Sanjukta 
Gupta. 
 
 Then pray yer stinking ass off that you can meet someone 
 that can show you something useful. Tantric usefull - idiot.
 
 You don't do anything except read stuff and make grand claims.
 
 
  
 
 ---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, 
<noozguru@...> mailto:noozguru@... wrote:
 
 You were not even a teacher of TM, I was. You were never a tantric.  I am.  
KMA.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to