This may a good time to take a reality check:
To meditate means to think things over. Meditation is based on thinking,
and there's hardly a person on the planet who doesn't pause at least
once or twice every day and take stock of their own mental contents.
And, everyone is transcending all the time, even without a technique.
"Anyone who can think can meditate." MMY
meditation:
–noun
1 to think calm thoughts in order to
relax or as a religious activity:
Sophie meditates for 20 minutes every
day.
2 to think seriously about something
for a long time:
He meditated on the consequences of his decision.
Source:
Cambridge University Dictionary:
http://tinyurl.com/dz5ut2
On 11/7/2013 7:20 AM, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com wrote:
*Om, II.*
*TM meditators are effortless meditators.*
*Not all Buddhist meditators are effortless meditators.*
*[see preparatory introductory lecture to learning TM].*
*Therefore, not all Buddhists are transcendental meditators.*
*Om,*
*There are TM meditators*
*There are Buddhist meditators*
Anyone who meditates with the aim of samadhi is a Buddhist.
Therefore, Transcendental Meditators are Buddhists.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
It is said, "Anyone who meditates with the aim of samadhi is a Buddhist".
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote:
Ok, Richard, nobody else is gonna challenge you on this. Actually I'm
not either. But it would be great if you could say more about it.
Seems revolutionary (-:
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <punditster@...> wrote:
Anyone who meditates with the aim of samadhi is a Buddhist.
On 11/3/2013 4:42 PM, s3raphita@...
<mailto:s3raphita@...> wrote:
*Is it possible to be a Buddhist and practice meditation effortlessly?*
Yes, according to MMY.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com>,
<fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
*Should TM'er Buddhists even be allowed to have a Dome badge? Is it
possible to be a buddhist and practice meditation effortlessly?*
*-Buck*
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com>, <s3raphita@...>
<mailto:s3raphita@...> wrote:
Re "The Gnostic prophet Mani taught radical dualist cosmology; a
struggle between the opposing forces of good and evil, spiritual
light versus the material world darkness. Humans are composed of two
opposing elements in a battle for power. There is a soul, but it is
influenced by elements of both good and evil. Manichaeism is similar
to the dualistic Bogomils, Paulicians, and Cathars. It's not
complicated. Adepts in China and the Far East would probably relate
to this with their own notions of Yin and Yang.":
The Yin and Yang "concepts" point to a Tao that includes the
opposites. Imagining that one side of a pair of opposites could gain
the upper hand over the other would be a vulgar error.
As the little we know about Manichaeism and similar "dualist"
religions/philosophies comes to us from hostile sources isn't it
possible that these beliefs weren't as dualist as they've been
painted but perhaps also had the idea of a Transcendence that
reconciled the positive and negative aspects of life?
---In fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com>, <punditster@...>
<mailto:punditster@...> wrote:
So, let's review what we know about the prophet Mani.
The Gnostic prophet Mani taught radical dualist cosmology; a struggle
between the opposing forces of good and evil, spiritual light versus
the material world darkness. Humans are composed of two opposing
elements in a battle for power. There is a soul, but it is influenced
by elements of both good and evil. Manichaeism is similar to the
dualistic Bogomils, Paulicians, and Cathars. It's not complicated.
Adepts in China and the Far East would probably relate to this with
their own notions of Yin and Yang, which is probably derived from the
Indian Sankhya, a radical dualism, and later tantra- a theory of
polarity which posits male and female energies.
The name 'Mani' is Sanskrit. Mani traveled and lived in India for
several years, visiting Buddhist lands such as Bamiyan in
Afghanistan, so it is not surprising that Buddhist influences would
be apparent. Mani apparently adopted his theory of the reincarnation
(transmigration of souls) from the Buddhists. Mani's sect structure
was apparently based on the Buddhist Sangha, that is, Arhants and the
lay follower community.
On 11/2/2013 11:31 AM, emptybill@...
<mailto:emptybill@...> wrote:
No wonder the Near-Eastern realm got so mixed up. *//*
It seems that as Manichean ideology spread to the East it
incorporated Buddhist concepts along the way in a effort to show the
superiority of the "Religion of Light." Mani lived during the third
century of the current era. Mani used the epitaph "Buddha of Light"
and identified himself as Maitreya. He and his followers
specifically borrowed from early Pure Land Sutras and Nagarjuna's
Madhyamaka philosophy. As it entered the region of Gandhara and
spread to China it used the Buddhist Hinayana tradition to support
its views of "matter, the body and the world."
MANICHAEAN VIEWS OF BUDDHISM
*/David A. Scott /*
*//*
*/Christ Church College /**/of /**/Higher Education/*
