I sent this at 10:30 this morning. It was posted at 4:18 pm. It must be a sign.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <emilymaenot@...> wrote: I'm rootin' for you Share. I'm slow on the uptake too, but I think I got this one. The clue is: Read *all* the words, as Judy has pointed out. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote: Read what I wrote again, dimwit. HINT: Read all the words. When you see where you made your mistake, let us know, OK? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <sharelong60@...> wrote: > Judy, from what I noted, Maharishi said that Brahman is maya. You wrote that > Maharishi > said that Brahman is not maya. Maybe it's simply a case of the teacher > contradicting himself > so that the students don't get trapped in intellectual understanding. On Monday, November 11, 2013 11:17 AM, "authfriend@..." <authfriend@...> wrote: "OTOH"?? Read what I wrote again, Share. Share fumbled: > OTOH, in the Veda it's written: Brahman says, "My indestructible maya." And > Maharishi has explained that at the deepest level of every cell of our body, > Purusha IS > Prakriti. (snip) I wrote: > > Finally, according to Maharishi, Maya is "that which is not"--but the > > illusion involved is > > not that Maya is not real, but rather that it isn't Brahman.