I think it's going to take way more than one good Pope to bust up the 
contemporary image of Roman Catholicism! As for the Church having a *doctrine* 
of social justice, caring for the oppressed, what good is it if the Church 
hordes its Vatican gold plates while babies are starving in the world?!





On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 3:17 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
<authfri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
  
It's just so startling hearing something like that these days from anyone but a 
librul-type Protestant or Jew. Francis is really busting up the contemporary 
image of Roman Catholicism. Of course Church doctrine has always had a very 
strong social-justice, caring-for-the-oppressed component; it just hasn't been 
the most evident theme in recent times.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:


Very good that he actually said it. I am not terribly religious myself, though 
he has a lot of influence, being The Pope, and all.

 



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote:
>
>
>Thom Hartmann actually said that he might have to convert to Catholicism.  Not 
>me, I'm not into religions at all.  But you don't have to be the Pope to 
>figure this out.
>
>
>On 11/27/2013 12:00 PM, authfriend@... wrote:
>>
>  
>>Powerful stuff.
>>
>>
>>I think if Bhairitu reads it, he'll immediately convert to Roman Catholicism. 
>>;-)
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>>---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>I like this guy - He tells the truth, straight up. 
>>
>>Even as the American Dream becomes less obtainable for
                most here, he points out, plainly, that the rest of the
                world, is suffering, far more than we do in the West;
                wars are waged simply for economic gain, rampant
                consumerism is dehumanizing everyone, and 'trickle down
                economics' is a naive idea, at best, and clearly does
                not work. 
>>
>>
>>http://www.businessinsider.com/the-pope-on-the-financial-system-inequality-money-2013-11
>

Reply via email to