Tell ya what, Salyavin, read the article and get back to us, OK?
 
Salyavin wrote:

 Before you give rights to chimps you should work out if they are capable of 
understanding what is being offered. Anthropomorphism isn't any way to go about 
helping wildlife. 
 

 Chimps aren't people, they are chimps and they can't fit into our world in the 
same way we couldn't fit into theirs. They aren't as "like us" as a lot of 
people think. We should only extend personhood to people as they are capable of 
learning a language and communicating their needs themselves, with obvious 
exceptions.
 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote:

 We're getting there.
 

 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/03/science/rights-group-sues-to-have-chimp-recognized-as-legal-person.html
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/03/science/rights-group-sues-to-have-chimp-recognized-as-legal-person.html?hp





Reply via email to