Richard, how about Judy set up a macro for everyone she rags on. Then she'd have more time for her clients.
On Friday, December 20, 2013 10:02 AM, Richard J. Williams <pundits...@gmail.com> wrote: So, why don't you set a macro for Share? LoL! On 12/20/2013 9:52 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote: >See, Share, some might say that the mean-spirited snark in your post not only >far outweighs any positive effect of the purported compliment, but suggests >that there is actually no genuine positive feeling behind the compliment. All >the energy is in the snark; the purported compliment is lifeless. > > >IOW, Emily's comment highlighting the snark and ignoring the compliment is far >more honest than either your original post or your response here. > >Share whined: > > ><< See, Emily, imo your post is a form of dishonesty because you leave out the >part where I say the tree and photo are lovely. And it's sneaky dishonesty to >boot. >> > > > > > > > >On Friday, December 20, 2013 8:53 AM, "emilymaenot@..." <emilymaenot@...> >wrote: > > >Re: I shall now enlighten you both about my immediate and mundane reaction to >the photo of her Christmas tree that Ann posted. Hold onto your seatbelts! >"Huh?! But wait a minute! I've seen this photo before! Is this the same photo >Ann posted last year?!" > > >Yes, Barry is correct. Share definitely exhibits "range and an ability to >feel positive emotion." I'm all teared up with this warm and fuzzy response. > > >
