"authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >
> > > > Even if it's true, it's nasty stuff. > > Boy, is it ever. I wonder what makes such a list "nasty"? Some men might be proud and boastful of such a list. Society doesn't say that Wilt Chamberlain's or whoever's elses list is "nasty". Maybe a bit unbalanced with respect to pursuing other / additional things in life, but not nasty. Some women might be proud to be on the list. Some women might have their own list, notches on the bedpost, so to speak. Some, including some on the list, or their friends, might think the list is funny -- in that for some women it would be so out of character. I wonder if a list of the deceptions and odd power-power tripping by BM and others is more nasty? Is sex inherently "more nasty"? My questions here, as elsewhre, are not arguments in disguise. They are simply questions. Questions about underlying assumptions. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
