you are still an idiot who can't read - the MUM folks claim NONE of them are
under the age of 18
--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 2/13/14, Richard J. Williams <pundits...@gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: More on missing pandits
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, February 13, 2014, 3:09 PM
On 2/13/2014 8:04 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
> I wonder why no one in the press questions the purpose
of keeping
> these people in Iowa?
>
It would probably be in the best interests of the poor Hindu
pandit boys
if they were left alone to pray and get an education in
Vedic City. Most
of us here probably think it would be better not to involve
the children
in a sordid FFL debate. There's nothing good going to
come from
discussing the private life of under age children on a
public forum. It
would probably be much better to just leave the children
alone and raise
our own - that's more appropriate and rewarding than
smearing some
religious group in Iowa. That's what I think.
