You are in delusion too much of the time, Richard. I don't know if you really believe your convoluted posts or if you do it on purpose to amuse yourself. You are losing/have lost all credibility with this MO. The point was to clear up Share's lack of knowledge about using the word "transcript" to mean "article" - it was an inaccurate use of the word in the way she was applying it. Your post is completely irrelevant and meaningless. Case closed.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <punditster@...> wrote : From now on and henceforth, on FFL, a transcript means any written record of a speech, debate, or a discussion; and shall not be used as a legal document in any case law; or submitted to a school board as a record of grades and course completed. To reiterate: A transcript is any written record of a speech, debate, or discussion. There are no legal documents on this chat site. Case closed. On 3/16/2014 10:45 AM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote: A transcript is a complete, verbatim written record of everything that was said, without narrative interpolations (except perhaps for "[laughter]" or "[applause]"). A transcript is a complete, verbatim written record of everything that was said, without narrative interpolations (except perhaps for "[laughter]" or "[applause]"). You are overruled 2-1: On FFL and most other discussion groups, a transcript means any written record of a speech, debate, or discussion, not a legal document. Sorry, you don't make the rules around here. Now take your seat, Ms Stein.
