there must be limitations to the practical function of faith in the real world. 
There are a lot of folks who have faith that the Marshy Effect is real when in 
fact it is not. The same group has faith that vastu ved is gonna straighten 
their lives out when in fact it does not. Some few individuals have faith that 
crop circles are actually made by ETs when in fact they are not.
--------------------------------------------
On Fri, 4/18/14, wgm4u <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: What are the *benefits* of believing in God?
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Friday, April 18, 2014, 2:14 PM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
     
       
       
       
 Faith and believe in God
 are powerful tools that enable you to do that which you
 could not do by yourself! The belief in a higher power
 enables one to go beyond your own limitations and do
 things you thought impossible. Conversely, if you have no
 belief in your higher power you cut yourself off from that
 inner resource, even if you believe in YOURSELF you will be
 more successful than if you don't, which should be
 obvious, hence the importance in belief! It opens the door
 to YOUR inner power! But you must have faith in it and
 practice it!
 "Truly I
 tell you, if you have faith as small as a
 mustard seed,
 you can say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’
 and it will move. Nothing will be
 impossible for you.” Matt 17:20
 
  
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> wrote :
 
 
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 <steve.sundur@...> wrote :
 
 Probably not what you are
 looking for, but what I've observed from the atheists,
 at least on this forum is that they are more comfortable
 keeping the discussion on highly abstract issues.
  Issues that can't really be resolved one way or
 the other, or at least kept on a bit of solid
 ground.
 For
 example, does the belief in atheism necessitate the tabla
 rasa theory that we are born with a "blank slate"?
  Do the atheists believe that when we die, it all goes
 to black.
 Good questions, speaking entirely
 for myself - as atheists (as far as I know) aren't a
 gang with a set of instructions about what threshold of
 beliefs you need to reach before being a member - it's
 more about just not having a belief that there has ever been
 any sort of creator and relying instead
 on both uncertainty where necessary and confidence where
 appropriate. Everything is subject to review as more
 information comes to light, including whether or not there
 is any sort of god. But nobody actually knows whether
 there is one and given the apparent lack of necessity and
 amount of better explanations for god's traditional
 roles I know where I'd place my
 money.
 I
 like the idea of life after death though, it'd be cool
 to wake up in heaven or on the next stage of the computer
 game we all might be playing. I also like the idea of
 reincarnation be nice to know I may in some way get another
 go at this.But looking at what we know about animals and
 brains and evolution I'd have to say it isn't very
 likely. In fact, if I was a gambling man, I'd say the
 odds weren't worth much of a stake. But there might be
 something we don't know of course. It's a case of
 finding out later with that one but don't hold your
 breath.
 You
 can always say, "we have no evidence.....', but
 I'd like to know if it's what they
 "believe".
 I
 ask that because there are many instances that would
 contradict these two assumptions.
 And
 sometimes when pressed, you will hear the atheist reply
 with, "there is so much we don't know about
 genetics", or "there is so much we don't know
 about how the brain works", which sounds a lot like,
 "God works in mysterious way".  Now , the
 "God works in mysterious ways" doesn't do it
 for me either, but neither does the genetics things, or the
 brain thing, at least as it is often used here.
  
 Often just a lame default, I
 think,.
 I would say that the progress that has
 been made in studying consciousness in a short time has been
 rather impressive. Given the power of the scientific method
 to get to the bottom of things I would expect to get a
 working model of consciousness and self awareness very soon. We know where
 thoughts occur, what part of the brain needs to be active in
 order for consciousness to function (and how to knock it
 out), if it's possible to do it then we will.
 Unquestionably. The brain is after all another physical
 structure..... 
 .....Unless there is something
 really unusual going on. You have to look at it from an
 evolutionists perspective, there haven't always been
 brains and you can trace their growth from early on in
 history, it shouldn't be too hard to build a graph
 showing which animal has which level of awareness. We seem
 to be the only one with the ability to sit back and think
 about it. That's the only difference I can see with us:
 we have a metaphorical inner life and can make up abstract
 ideas like afterlife's. How we got that adaptation is a
 mystery but maybe not such a big one. 
 And of course,
 having an explanation of the consciousness "hard"
 problem doesn't mean we are going to be able to easily
 fit it to our own experience. And I expect there will be a
 lot of people who refuse to even try.
 So it
 isn't really lame, just a statement that there are still
 mysteries. And mysteries that I refuse to fill with woo
 woo.
 
 
 So, that
 would be my take on the issue.
 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...>
 wrote :
 
 Sometimes I look at the way that believers react to
 the word "atheist" -- spitting it out as if it
 were an epithet -- and find it a curious reaction. I mean,
 with the exception of a vocal few who make their livings by
 poking theists just to watch them react, I don't see
 most everyday atheists (and I know quite a few, living where
 I live) reacting to believers in the same fashion. Unless
 the believers are trying to sell the atheists their beliefs,
 that is. Then all bets are off and the atheists can react to
 the proselytizing believers however they wish. 
 
 Anyway,
 it's like the believers perceive the atheists as a
 *threat*, and as if by
 believing what they do and <spit> daring to say it
 aloud or write it somewhere they are trying to *take*
 something from them. 
 
 I
 don't get this. *What*, after all, could an atheist
 "take" from a believer in God? They've got all
 they need by believing that there is someone/something IN
 CHARGE, and that there is a PLAN for all of this, right? So
 why are they so antagonistic towards a few vocal atheists
 speaking their minds and suggesting that no one is in charge
 and that there is no plan?
 
 To
 help me understand this, I'm asking the believers in God
 here to speak up and tell me what the BENEFITS of such a
 belief are. Such that you would miss them and feel something
 had been taken from you if you no longer believed?
 
 What
 would such BENEFITS be? 
 
 Surely
 you can name a few. 
 
 
 
 
 
     
      
 
     
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Reply via email to