On 5/9/2014 4:44 PM, nablusoss1008 wrote:

They are ? I don't see why unless they are certain a soul has entered the fetus. Otherwise "It's like burning down an abandoned house"

- Maharishi

>
So, I don't think anybody on FFL would /voluntarily/ get pregnant /*just so they could have an abortion*/. Most people are against abortion on /general health principles/. And, a woman's right to choose trumps laws against abortion, but that doesn't mean you should have unprotected sex just to prove a point.

People should practice family planning in order to avoid the responsibility that lies ahead. Since, you're not female, it's really none of your business anyway. Go figure.


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <punditster@...> wrote :

    On 5/9/2014 11:20 AM, Duveyoung wrote:
    >
    > For the anti-abortionists here -- choke on this.
    >
    Almost everyone posting to FFL seems to be "anti-abortion"- but
    they might also exercise their right to choose. So, what's your point?




---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.
http://www.avast.com
  • Re: [FairfieldL... Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
  • Re: [FairfieldL... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
    • Re: [Fairf... nablusoss1008
      • Re: [F... Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
        • Re... nablusoss1008
        • Re... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
        • Re... nablusoss1008
      • Re: [F... 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]

Reply via email to